Marriage of Angell v. Angell
791 N.W.2d 530
Minn.2010Background
- This is a federal preemption case arising from a Minnesota dissolution of marriage between Gordon Angell, Jr. and Loretta Angell.
- The district court treated the federal death gratuity and Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) proceeds as marital/nonmarital property and divided them, including an award to Angell to prevent unfair hardship.
- Respondent was the sole named beneficiary of the death benefits; nearly all checks were made out to or deposited for her.
- The district court recharacterized respondent’s death benefits as nonmarital and then awarded $150,000 to Angell under Minnesota’s unfair-hardship provision, § 518.58, subd. 2.
- The court of appeals held the federal anti-attachment provisions preempted any award of federal death benefits to Angell, and this Court affirmed preemption.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether federal anti-attachment statutes preempt a state-divorce award of federal death benefits to a non-beneficiary | Angell argues preemption blocks any share to him | Angell contends benefits belong to beneficiary only under federal law | Yes; federal law preempts the award to Angell |
Key Cases Cited
- Ridgway v. Ridgway, 454 U.S. 46 (1981) (anti-attachment preempts state actions altering federal life-insurance proceeds)
- Wissner v. Wissner, 338 U.S. 655 (1950) (anti-attachment preempts state diverts of benefits after payment)
- Hisquierdo v. Hisquierdo, 439 U.S. 572 (1979) (anti-attachment provisions pre-empt state law in domestic relations context)
- Rose v. Rose, 481 U.S. 619 (1987) (child support from veteran benefits can be exempt or not depending on purpose of benefits)
- In re Barg, 752 N.W.2d 52 (Minn. 2008) (supremacy and preemption framework for federal/state conflict)
