Marquez v. State
298 Ga. 448
Ga.2016Background
- On March 3, 2010 Maxwell Fiandt was shot and killed in his apartment; marijuana and a broken jar were found at the scene.
- Hector Marquez, Jahvon Pittman, and Melville Reid were indicted on multiple charges; Reid pled guilty to voluntary manslaughter and testified for the State at trial.
- Marquez and Pittman were tried jointly in Fulton County; jury convicted Marquez of felony murder and unlawful possession of a firearm during a felony; life sentence for felony murder with a consecutive 5-year firearms term (suspended).
- Marquez testified that the killing was accidental and that Pittman accidentally fired the gun after a scuffle; Pittman did not testify and asserted an alibi through other witnesses.
- Marquez moved pretrial to sever his trial from Pittman, arguing antagonistic defenses and prejudice from a joint trial; the trial court denied the motion.
- Marquez appealed solely on the ground that the denial of severance violated his due process rights; the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying severance of Marquez and Pittman | Marquez: joint trial was prejudicial because Pittman asserted an antagonistic alibi defense and Marquez could not call Pittman to testify | State/Pittman: joint trial proper; antagonistic defenses alone do not require severance; no showing of specific prejudice | Denial affirmed — no abuse of discretion; antagonistic defenses alone insufficient and Marquez failed to show actual prejudice or that Pittman would have testified exculpatorily |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (legal sufficiency standard for criminal convictions)
- Nwakanma v. State, 296 Ga. 493 (factors for severance analysis)
- Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 829 (burden on defendant to show prejudice from joint trial)
- Howard v. State, 279 Ga. 166 (antagonistic defenses not necessarily harmful)
- Kitchens v. State, 296 Ga. 384 (presence of antagonistic defenses alone insufficient to require severance)
- Butler v. State, 270 Ga. 441 (severance requires showing of denial of due process)
- Butler v. State, 290 Ga. 412 (inability to compel co-defendant testimony not per se grounds for severance absent a showing the testimony would be exculpatory)
- Owen v. State, 266 Ga. 312 (same principle regarding co-defendant testimony)
- Cain v. State, 235 Ga. 128 (same principle regarding co-defendant testimony)
- Perry v. State, 173 Ga. App. 541 (discussing co-defendant testimony at joint trial)
- Price v. State, 155 Ga. App. 206 (discussing co-defendant testimony at joint trial)
