History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marlette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
57 A.3d 1224
Pa.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Marlettes sued State Farm for uninsured motorist coverage after a collision with an uninsured driver; liability was uncontested.
  • Jury awarded $550,000 to Mr. Marlette for bodily injuries and lost wages, and $150,000 to Mrs. Marlette for loss of consortium.
  • Trial court molded the verdict to reflect State Farm's $250,000 UM policy limit, resulting in a molded verdict of $238,306.98 after credit for an earlier $16,693.02 payment.
  • Marlette moved for delay damages under Pa.R.Civ.P. 238 on the $550,000 verdict; the court awarded delay damages based on the molded verdict.
  • Superior Court remanded to recalculate delay damages based on the jury verdict; the court ultimately held delay damages must be based on the molded verdict, aligning with Allen v. Mellinger.
  • This Court granted review to decide whether delay damages may be recovered on the full jury verdict or only on the legally-recoverable molded verdict under Rule 238.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Basis for delaying damages under Rule 238 in UM action Marlette should recover on full verdict Damages limited to molded amount per Allen and policy cap Delay damages limited to molded verdict amount
Application of Allen to private parties vs. Commonwealth Allen applies to private UM case; full verdict permissible Allen distinguishes Commonwealth cap from private policy limits Allen's cap-based approach extends to private parties in UM actions
Role of policy limits in delay damages calculation Policy limits should not reduce jury verdict for delay damages Delay damages must reflect policy-limited recoverable amount Delay damages limited to legally-recoverable molded verdict under policy limits

Key Cases Cited

  • Allen v. Mellinger, 567 Pa. 1, 784 A.2d 762 (2001) (Pa. 2001) (delay damages for private parties limited to statutory cap; overruled Woods)
  • Woods v. Dept. of Transportation, 531 Pa. 295, 612 A.2d 970 (1992) (Pa. 1992) (initial view that delay damages tied to verdict; later overruled by Allen)
  • LaRue v. McGuire, 885 A.2d 549 (Pa.Super.2005) (Pa. Super. 2005) (slip-and-fall; delay damages based on stipulated damages cap)
  • Laudenberger v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, 496 Pa. 52, 436 A.2d 147 (1981) (Pa. 1981) (Rule 238 promulgation proper despite impact on substantive rights)
  • Thompson v. T.J. Whipple Co., 985 A.2d 221 (Pa.Super.2009) (Pa. Super. 2009) (cited for comparison in policy considerations)
  • Anchorstar v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 533 Pa. 177, 620 A.2d 1120 (1993) (Pa. 1993) (delay damages not available for loss of consortium)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Marlette v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 28, 2012
Citation: 57 A.3d 1224
Court Abbreviation: Pa.