History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marina District Development Co. v. City of Atlantic City
27 N.J. Tax 469
N.J. Tax Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • MDDC owns one Borgata parcel and leases the rest from MAC, located in Atlantic City as a single casino-hotel complex.
  • As part of a city-wide 2008 real estate revaluation, assessments totaled about $2.21 billion and were raised to about $2.26 billion for 2009 and 2010.
  • Plaintiff challenged 2009 and 2010 assessments, contending the true market value on Oct. 1, 2008 and Oct. 1, 2009 was lower; the municipality counterclaimed to raise the assessments.
  • The Borgata expanded prior to the valuation dates, including the Water Club Tower (June 2008) and a prior casino expansion, increasing capacity and amenities.
  • National and regional economic downturns, plus expanding gaming competition in neighboring states, depressed Atlantic City’s casino-hotel market beginning in 2007–2009.
  • The court found that the income approach, incorporating industry trends and a Rushmore-style business value deduction, yields the most credible true market values of $880,000,000 (as of Oct. 1, 2008) and $870,000,000 (as of Oct. 1, 2009).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the income approach with business value extraction is credible Plaintiff contends income approach withRushmore deduction best reflects value. Defendant argues income approach is plausible but Rushmore deduction unnecessary or unreliable. Income approach with Rushmore-extracted business value adopted as credible.
Whether cost or sales-comparison approaches are reliable for casino-hotel value Plaintiff argues cost/sales approaches are unreliable for casinos and should not drive value. Defendant argues cost approach is credible but undervalued due to market change; sales approach lacks reliable comparables. Court rejects cost and sales approaches as primary; adopts income approach.
Whether the court properly overcomes the presumption of validity of the assessments Plaintiff asserts credible testimony and data show assessments exceed true value. Defendant contends presumption remains due to tax-law principles unless substantial evidence proves otherwise. Plaintiff overcomes presumption; true market value found for both years.

Key Cases Cited

  • Ginnetti v. City of Atlantic City, 17 N.J.Tax 354 (Tax 1998) ( court may adopt expert value when credible)
  • Ace Gaming, LLC, 23 N.J.Tax 70 (Tax 2006) (income approach favored for casino-hotels; cost approach insufficient)
  • City of New Brunswick v. Division of Tax Appeals, 39 N.J. 537 (1963) (valuations standards and market-corroborated approaches)
  • Rodwood Gardens, Inc. v. City of Summit, 188 N.J. Super. 34 (App.Div. 1982) (averaging income is inappropriate for projection of income)
  • Prudential Ins. Co. v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills, 16 N.J.Tax 58 (Tax 1995) (Rushmore approach for hotel-enterprise valuation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Marina District Development Co. v. City of Atlantic City
Court Name: New Jersey Tax Court
Date Published: Oct 18, 2013
Citation: 27 N.J. Tax 469
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Tax Ct.