MARIANI v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY
2015 OK 13
| Okla. | 2015Background
- Carolyn Mariani was injured in a 2011 motor-vehicle collision with a State employee; she sued under the Governmental Tort Claims Act (GTCA).
- Mariani's insurer (AAA) paid her $100,000 in UM benefits and $25,000 in medical payments; AAA waived subrogation.
- The State stipulated employee scope-of-employment and that it had no applicable liability insurance covering the accident; statutory GTCA caps applied (trial court capped recovery at $175,000).
- The State sought a setoff at trial for the $125,000 Mariani had already received from her own insurance, relying on 51 O.S. §§ 158(E) and 162(D).
- The trial court denied the setoff and entered judgment for Mariani for $175,000; the State appealed the setoff issue to the Oklahoma Supreme Court.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether 51 O.S. §§ 158(E) and 162(D) permit the State to set off amounts paid to the claimant by the claimant's own insurer (UM/medical payments) from the State's GTCA liability | Mariani: statutes do not abrogate the collateral source rule; the provisions apply to insurance covering the State, not the claimant's private insurance | State: the language exempts the State from liability for payments made through any "applicable contract or policy of insurance," so it should get a setoff for claimant's UM and medical benefits | The Court held the statutes refer to insurance applicable to the State (or its employee), not the claimant's private UM/medical benefits; the collateral source rule stands and the State is not entitled to the sought setoff |
Key Cases Cited
- Blythe v. University of Oklahoma, 82 P.3d 1021 (2003 OK 115) (recognizing collateral source rule application)
- Denco Bus Lines, Inc. v. Hargis, 229 P.2d 560 (1951) (payments from plaintiff's own insurance do not reduce defendant's liability)
- Overturff v. Hart, 531 P.2d 1035 (1975 OK 13) (insurer procured by defendant is not a collateral source)
- Salazar Roofing & Construction, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma City, 249 P.3d 950 (2010 OK 34) (GTCA does not bar claimant from recovering despite collateral-source payments)
- Vanderpool v. State, 672 P.2d 1153 (1983 OK 82) (abrogation of governmental immunity and legislative response leading to GTCA)
