History
  • No items yet
midpage
134 Conn. App. 716
Conn. App. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Malone acquired the property in 1958; in 1978, ownership to Carol Malone and herself in survivorship.
  • In 1958 the parcel was split-zoned: ~86% residential, ~14% business district.
  • Since 1958, plaintiffs claimed to operate a garbage/refuse business from the residence and stored trucks and bins on the site.
  • In 1979 the zoning regulations were amended, rezoning the business district portion; since then the entire parcel has been residential.
  • In fall 2008, the zoning enforcement officer issued a cease and desist order for alleged residential-zone violations of business uses and storage.
  • Plaintiffs appealed to the board under § 8-7, asserting preexisting, legal nonconforming uses; no variance was sought.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did the board address the preexisting nonconforming use claim? Malone claims the board did not decide that issue. Board relied on cease and desist validity under current regs and record; it did discuss the issue in record but not in final decision. Board failed to issue a formal determination; remand required.

Key Cases Cited

  • Wood v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 258 Conn. 691 (2001) (board must decide preexisting use claim first; remand if not)
  • Point O'Woods Assn., Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 178 Conn. 364 (1979) (preexisting use status is a factual determination for the board)
  • Wiltzius v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 106 Conn.App. 1 (2008) (nonconforming use protection and burden on claimant)
  • Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 74 Conn.App. 622 (2003) (burden to prove nonconforming use validity)
  • Vine v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 102 Conn.App. 863 (2007) (defer to board's decision; review for reasonableness; proof burden on plaintiffs)
  • Mountain Brook Assn., Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 133 Conn.App. 359 (2012) (incomplete board reasoning requires search of record for basis)
  • Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 225 Conn. 731 (1993) (limits on court's ability to substitute factual determinations for agency)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Malone v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF WESTPORT
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Apr 10, 2012
Citations: 134 Conn. App. 716; 39 A.3d 1233; 2012 Conn. App. LEXIS 174; 2012 WL 1088242; AC 33123
Docket Number: AC 33123
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
Log In
    Malone v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF WESTPORT, 134 Conn. App. 716