Maloch v. Salt Lake County Metro Jail
2:12-cv-01084
D. UtahJun 21, 2013Background
- Maloch, a pro se prisoner, filed a 1983 civil rights complaint in forma pauperis in the District of Utah.
- Court screening identifies deficiencies and orders amendment to cure them before proceeding.
- Defendants incorrectly named Salt Lake County Metro Jail as a separate entity capable of suit.
- Plaintiff’s claims lack a proved municipal policy or custom linking Salt Lake County to alleged rights violations.
- Court notes Heck v. Humphrey may require dismissal of claims that would imply invalidation of a conviction or sentence.
- Order directs 30-day cure period and provision of the Pro Se Litigant Guide; failure to cure will result in dismissal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the jail can be sued as a separate entity | Maloch argues the jail is the proper defendant. | The jail is not a separate legal entity; the claims should be against Salt Lake County. | Claims fail to state against the county. |
| Whether the claim states municipal-liability under §1983 | Plaintiff asserts county liability for a policy or custom. | Plaintiff has not shown a direct causal link between policy and violation. | No direct policy link shown; failure to state a Monell claim. |
| Whether Heck bars the claims seeking relief that would imply invalidation of conviction | Plaintiff seeks damages for rights violations arising from imprisonment. | If relief would imply invalid conviction, Heck bars the claim. | Claims may be dismissed if conviction not already invalidated. |
| Whether Plaintiff must amend with proper pleadings and personal participation | Plaintiff should be allowed to amend. | Supervisory liability requires personal participation; mere supervisory position is insufficient. | Amendment required; must plead personal participation and specific conduct. |
Key Cases Cited
- City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (1989) (establishes municipal liability requires policy or custom and causal link)
- Monell v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978) (municipal liability requires policy or custom, not respondeat superior)
- Cannon v. City and County of Denver, 998 F.2d 867 (10th Cir. 1993) (Monell-type liability; limits on supervisory liability)
- Jenkins v. Wood, 81 F.3d 988 (10th Cir. 1996) (requires direct causal link between custom/policy and violation)
- Mitchell v. Maynard, 80 F.2d 1433 (10th Cir. 1996) (supervisory liability not established by position alone)
- Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106 (10th Cir. 1991) (pro se pleadings must meet basic pleading standards)
