History
  • No items yet
midpage
249 P.3d 234
Wyo.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Dial suffered a work neck injury on June 10, 2004 and underwent fusion surgery on March 15, 2005.
  • A 2005 physical capacity evaluation by Rodeman found Dial could not return to heavy work but could perform medium work.
  • An IME by Dr. Zondag (Sept. 29, 2005) placed Dial at 26% WPI and within medium work capacity.
  • Division initially awarded a PPI and later denied a PPD based on White’s labor market findings showing no 95% wage jobs without driving; later, Dial’s driving restriction and license suspension affected job availability.
  • OAH awarded PPD on Nov. 30, 2007; Division petitioned for judicial review and the district court reversed in 2009.
  • The Wyoming Supreme Court reversed the district court and remanded to reinstate the OAH order awarding benefits.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the OAH award was supported by substantial evidence Mahaffey argues the record shows Dial could not obtain 95% wage work due to injury Division contends available jobs at 95% wage exist and Dial’s driving issue is non-work-related Yes; the OAH award was supported by substantial evidence
Whether the district court properly reviewed the OAH decision Mahaffey contends district court properly reviewed and should not substitute its view Division argues district court properly assessed substantial evidence No; district court erred in substituting its judgment; remand warranted

Key Cases Cited

  • Bonsell v. State ex rel. Wyo. Workers' Safety & Comp. Div., 142 P.3d 689 (Wyo. 2006) (factors in loss of earning capacity and deference to agency as fact finder)
  • Block v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Comp. Div., 202 P.3d 1064 (Wyo. 2009) (burden on claimant to show 95% wage loss by preponderance)
  • Yother v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Comp. Div., 173 P.3d 356 (Wyo. 2007) (definition and application of 95% wage requirement)
  • Olivas v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Comp. Div., 130 P.3d 476 (Wyo. 2006) (expert testimony and sufficiency for agency decision)
  • Madeley v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Comp. Div., 134 P.3d 281 (Wyo. 2006) (review standard for completeness of administrative decision)
  • Langberg v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Comp. Div., 203 P.3d 1098 (Wyo. 2009) (equipoise burden-of-proof principles)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Mahaffey v. STATE EX REL. WYOMING WORKERS'SAFETY & COMPESATION DIV.
Court Name: Wyoming Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 11, 2011
Citations: 249 P.3d 234; 2011 WY 45; S-09-0091
Docket Number: S-09-0091
Court Abbreviation: Wyo.
Log In
    Mahaffey v. STATE EX REL. WYOMING WORKERS'SAFETY & COMPESATION DIV., 249 P.3d 234