History
  • No items yet
midpage
Magnus v. United States
11 A.3d 237
| D.C. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • In 1996 Magnus pled guilty to carrying a pistol without a license, possession of an unregistered firearm, and unlawful possession of ammunition; charges stemmed from handguns and ammunition found in his home.
  • Police executed a search at 814 Decatur Street, N.W.; two loaded handguns were found in a basement room, with marijuana and cash nearby.
  • Magnus admitted to possessing the weapons and was arrested; he later signed a police-prepared confession claiming ownership of the guns and describing past theft/robbery context.
  • He was sentenced to concurrent one-year probation on the weapon and ammunition counts; the marijuana possession charge was dismissed.
  • Magnus did not appeal the 1996 convictions and completed probation by 1998.
  • In 2009 Magnus sought relief under DC code § 23-110 or writ of error coram nobis, arguing Heller invalidated the statutes as applied to his home possession of guns and ammo.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Magnus can collateral attack a guilty plea post-Heller Magnus argues plea was unintelligent given Heller’s scope. Government advocates waiver of non-jurisdictional defects by guilty plea. Remand for evidentiary hearing on voluntariness and intelligence of the plea.
Whether coram nobis relief is available for legal errors post-Heller Coram nobis may correct constitutional legal error not criminalized after Heller. Waiver and lack of miscarriage of justice bar coram nobis here. Coram nobis relief potentially available; remand to hear merits.
Whether Magnus can overcome procedural default to pursue collateral relief Retroactivity of Heller supports relief despite default. Default and waiver preclude collateral attack absent cause/innocence. Open question; remand for evidentiary development on cause/innocence and miscarriage of justice.

Key Cases Cited

  • District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (U.S. 2008) (recognizes individual right to keep arms for self-defense in the home)
  • Plummer v. United States, 983 A.2d 323 (D.C.2009) (retroactivity for non-jurfisdictional gun-possession defenses)
  • Herrington v. United States, 6 A.3d 1237 (D.C.2010) (second-amendment protections for handgun ammunition in home)
  • Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614 (U.S. 1998) (innocence/knowledge of elements can render guilty plea unintelligent)
  • Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258 (U.S. 1973) (plea admits jurisdiction; cannot attack pre-plea rights unless plea is invalid)
  • Morgan, 346 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1954) (coram nobis scope to include fundamental legal errors)
  • Simmons v. United States, 656 A.2d 288 (D.C.1995) (post-sentencing standards for withdrawal of guilty plea)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Magnus v. United States
Court Name: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 6, 2011
Citation: 11 A.3d 237
Docket Number: 09-CO-1312, 10-CO-245
Court Abbreviation: D.C.