History
  • No items yet
midpage
Madison v. Groseth
230 Ariz. 8
| Ariz. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Madison borrowed $; deed of trust security on Glendale property; MERS and Executive Trustee substituted as beneficiaries/ trustee
  • Notice of trustee’s sale recorded for Sept. 2009 and later March 25, 2010; sale postponed
  • Madison sought to enjoin foreclosure in Feb. 2010; lis pendens recorded; sale occurred; Groseths bought property and obtained trustee’s deed
  • Madison was evicted; Groseths obtained forcible detainer judgment; Madison retained possession
  • December 2010 Madison filed tort-suit against Groseths and others seeking return of property and damages; court dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) and declared vexatious litigant
  • Madison appeals challenging dismissal and vexatious-litigant ruling; issues focus on waiver under § 33-811(C) and on pre-filing restrictions

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether § 33-811(C) waives defenses to the sale and bars tort claims Madison argues waiver should not bar due-process claims Groseths argue waiver applies to bar challenges to sale Waiver applies; tort claims dismissed
Whether the vexatious-litigant order was properly issued Madison contends record shows no frivolous/harassing pattern Groseths contend multiple suits justify restrictions Reversed portion of judgment; no proper finding of frivolous/harassing lawsuits
Whether notice/due process issues affect applicability of waiver Madison asserts improper notice undermines waiver Groseths rely on waiver language regardless of notice specifics Waiver applied; Madison had notice sufficient to seek injunction; due process not violated

Key Cases Cited

  • Mathews ex rel. Mathews v. Life Care Ctrs. of Am., Inc., 217 Ariz. 606 (App. 2008) (interpretation of waiver provisions and notice requirements under § 33-811(C))
  • Cook v. Losnegard, 228 Ariz. 202 (App. 2011) (due process and notice principles under waiver statute)
  • BT Capital, LLC v. TD Service Co. of Ariz., 229 Ariz. 299 (Ariz. 2012) (lis pendens cannot negate waiver provision; affects title conveyance)
  • De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144 (9th Cir. 1990) (standards for vexatious-litigant pre-filing restrictions)
  • Acker v. CSO Chevira, 188 Ariz. 252 (App. 1997) (courts’ inherent authority to curb abusive litigation)
  • Cannon v. Ariz. Game & Fish Comm’n ex rel. Attorney General, 85 Ariz. 1 (1958) (res judicata effect of forcible detainer judgment on possession)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Madison v. Groseth
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Arizona
Date Published: Jun 5, 2012
Citation: 230 Ariz. 8
Docket Number: No. 1 CA-CV 11-0222
Court Abbreviation: Ariz. Ct. App.