History
  • No items yet
midpage
MacHiavello v. State
308 Ga. App. 772
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Machiavello convicted of aggravated child molestation and two counts of child molestation, sexual battery, and cruelty to a child; appellate review follows.
  • Machiavello argues trial counsel were ineffective for failing to seek severance, for not calling certain witnesses, and for cross-examination tactics.
  • Trial court denied the motion to sever; counts involve two victims at different times and places; evidence could be admissible as a similar transaction.
  • Court analyzed joinder and severance under Georgia law, noting potential prejudice vs. coherence and the possibility of one incident aiding the other.
  • Record shows trial strategy focused on lack of physical injury to victims and cross-examination rather than presenting expert medical testimony; appeal challenges this strategy.
  • Judgment affirmed on all counts.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Severance denial review Machiavello Machiavello No abuse of discretion; severance not required.
Effectiveness re severance strategy Machiavello Machiavello Counsel not ineffective; denial would have occurred anyway.
Effectiveness re medical evidence strategy Machiavello State No ineffective assistance; strategic decision not to pursue experts was reasonable.
Cross-examination and witness testimony Machiavello State No merit; challenges to cross-examination rejected.

Key Cases Cited

  • Dingler v. State, 233 Ga. 462, 211 S.E.2d 752 (1975) (severance mandatory if joined solely for same/similar character)
  • Stewart v. State, 277 Ga. 138, 587 S.E.2d 602 (2003) (trial court discretion on severance when evidence may be admissible as similar transaction)
  • Chaparro v. State, 279 Ga. App. 145, 630 S.E.2d 645 (2006) (affirmed denial where number/complexity of offenses does not impair fair determination)
  • Rollinson v. State, 276 Ga. App. 375, 623 S.E.2d 211 (2005) (affirmed denial of severance in similar context)
  • Johnson v. State, 159 Ga. App. 333, 283 S.E.2d 375 (1981) (failure to make a useless/incorrect objection not ineffective assistance)
  • Wadley v. State, 258 Ga. 465, 369 S.E.2d 734 (1988) (two-part test for ineffective assistance; prejudice prong required)
  • Nelson v. State, 255 Ga. App. 315, 322-23, 565 S.E.2d 551 (2002) (insufficient showing on one prong defeats ineffective assistance claim)
  • Collier v. State, 266 Ga. App. 345, 351, 596 S.E.2d 795 (2004) (appellate review of trial counsel performance highly deferential)
  • McCombs v. State, 306 Ga. App. 64, 701 S.E.2d 496 (2010) (procedural compliance matters in briefing and appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: MacHiavello v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 25, 2011
Citation: 308 Ga. App. 772
Docket Number: A10A1641
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.