History
  • No items yet
midpage
398 S.W.3d 550
Mo. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Children placed in protective custody May 3, 2010; Father incarcerated about two weeks after care began; trial court terminated rights Aug 23, 2012.
  • Petitions to terminate filed June 21, 2011; trial held Aug 14, 2012; guardian ad litem recommended termination.
  • Griffiths, the caseworker, testified about Father’s limited contact, lack of financial support, and failure to engage services.
  • ICPC home study for J.H. (Mother’s relative) was approved but she did not visit or support the Children; placement refused.
  • Court found neglect and failure to rectify under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 211.447.5; termination based on best interests affirmed on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether there was clear, cogent evidence to support termination on neglect Father argues no neglect; incarceration excuses lack of support State argues incarceration does not preclude neglect finding Yes; neglect proven by lack of ongoing support and inability to care, despite incarceration.
Whether termination was in the Children’s best interests Office contends totality favors termination for permanency Father argues potential early release and bonds; not enough to defeat best interest Yes; termination in best interest supported by lack of commitment and future stability concerns.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re S.M.B., Jr., 254 S.W.3d 214 (Mo.App. S.D. 2008) (clear, cogent and convincing standard; evidence may be weighed against parent)
  • In re C.L.W., 115 S.W.3d 354 (Mo.App. S.D. 2003) (two-step termination framework; sustained on grounds and best interest)
  • Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976) (abuse of discretion standard for appellate review of termination)
  • In re L.N.D., 219 S.W.3d 820 (Mo.App. S.D. 2007) (incarceration does not absolve parent from minimal support duties)
  • In re M.L.K., 804 S.W.2d 398 (Mo.App. W.D. 1991) (incarceration not excusing continued parental relationship evidence)
  • In re J.M.S., 83 S.W.3d 76 (Mo.App. W.D. 2002) (incarceration may exist with termination when appropriate)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: M.H. v. Greene County Juvenile Office
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 28, 2013
Citations: 398 S.W.3d 550; 2013 WL 1281784; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 389; Nos. SD 32353, SD 32354
Docket Number: Nos. SD 32353, SD 32354
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
Log In