History
  • No items yet
midpage
M.E.V. v. R.D.V.
57 A.3d 126
Pa. Super. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Father and Mother, with two children, lived together in NJ and married in 2005.
  • Mother moved with the children to Erie, Pennsylvania in June 2011 after discovering Father’s affair.
  • Initial understandings contemplated a temporary relocation with a six-month reevaluation at most.
  • Father filed a NJ divorce/custody complaint on November 30, 2011, asserting NJ as home state and requesting joint custody with Father as primary residence.
  • Mother filed a PA custody complaint on January 13, 2012; Father filed preliminary objections asserting improper venue due to a prior NJ action.
  • The Erie trial court determined PA was the children’s home state and had jurisdiction; the Pennsylvania order was reversed on appeal for lack of proper jurisdiction and the matter remanded to NJ as the proper forum.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether PA had home state jurisdiction under UCCJEA given the move was temporary Father contends NJ remained the home state; PA was improper. Mother argues PA became home state due to actual relocation and six-month presence. Dismissed; PA is not the home state; NJ should determine jurisdiction.
Whether the mediation report from NJ was improperly excluded because of confidentiality Mother seeks exclusion of NJ mediation report on confidentiality grounds. Mother argues report should be admitted; confidentiality limits apply. Moot after holding on jurisdiction.
Whether the trial court erred by allowing questioning about marital infidelity Father objects to evidentiary line of questioning. Mother contends relevance to custody. Moot after holding on jurisdiction.

Key Cases Cited

  • Harcar v. Harcar, 982 A.2d 1230 (Pa.Super.2009) (UCCJA/UCCJEA principles; persistent jurisdictional concerns)
  • Goodman v. Goodman, 556 A.2d 1379 (Pa.Super.1989) (first in time and forum priority under UCCJA/UCCJEA)
  • Wagner v. Wagner, 887 A.2d 282 (Pa.Super.2005) (abuse of discretion standard for jurisdictional rulings)
  • Lucas v. Lucas, 882 A.2d 523 (Pa.Super.2005) (abuse of discretion standard for jurisdictional rulings)
  • B.J.D. v. D.L.C., 19 A.3d 1081 (Pa.Super.2011) (forum considerations under UCCJEA guidance)
  • R.M. v. J.S., 20 A.3d 496 (Pa.Super.2011) (temporary vs. permanent relocation affects home state)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: M.E.V. v. R.D.V.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 23, 2012
Citation: 57 A.3d 126
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.