Lvnv Funding LLC v. Scott Diana
A-2924-23
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.Apr 17, 2025Background
- Defendant Scott Diana was issued a credit card by Credit One Bank in 2015 and failed to make payments, leading to a charge-off in June 2016.
- The debt was assigned to plaintiff LVNV Funding, which attempted to contact Diana at his last known New Jersey address, confirmed via the USPS National Change of Address database.
- In January 2017, LVNV filed suit in New Jersey and served process via certified and regular mail; regular mail was not returned and certified mail was signed for by a family member at the address.
- Default judgment was entered against Diana in April 2017 after no response; the judgment totaled $618.91.
- Diana filed a motion to vacate more than six years later, arguing improper service and lack of reasonable notice, claiming he moved to Pennsylvania in 2016.
- The trial court denied the motion, finding Diana was aware of the judgment by 2019 and unreasonably delayed seeking relief; the Appellate Division affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Was service of process proper under the rules? | Service was valid at last known NJ address; mail received. | Service was improper since defendant had allegedly moved to PA. | Service proper under Rule 6:2-3; default not void for lack of due process. |
| Was the motion to vacate filed within a reasonable time? | Motion filed over six years post-judgment, and years after actual notice; delay unreasonable. | Delay justified by late discovery; no undue prejudice. | Delay was unreasonable; strategic, not exceptional, circumstances. |
| Are there exceptional circumstances justifying relief? | No exceptional facts; defendant received mail; strategic delay. | Default judgment should be set aside for fairness/equity. | No exceptional circumstances; no injustice, oppression, or inequity found. |
| Should the court exercise equitable discretion to vacate? | Equity favors finality; no abuse of discretion by trial court. | Court should vacate for lack of actual notice. | No abuse of discretion; equity favors finality; motion denied. |
Key Cases Cited
- U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Guillaume, 209 N.J. 449 (abuse of discretion standard for vacating default judgments)
- DEG, LLC v. Twp. of Fairfield, 198 N.J. 242 (Rule 4:50-1(f) as the equitable catch-all provision)
- Hous. Auth. of Morristown v. Little, 135 N.J. 274 (exceptional circumstances required for relief from judgment)
- Berger v. Paterson Veterans Taxi Serv., 244 N.J. Super. 200 (service defects can void judgments)
- Orner v. Liu, 419 N.J. Super. 431 (reasonable time for motions to vacate)
