midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2010 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 671
Pennsylvania Court of Common P...
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • LIU petitioned to vacate an arbitrator’s award dated July 15, 2010, sustaining two grievances filed by LIU school nurses Reino and Siracuse.
  • Nurses were assigned to cover absent colleagues’ caseloads from Oct 2008, traveling to other buildings as needed without substitutes for their own caseloads.
  • Grievants remained responsible for their own students while also handling the absent nurses’ caseloads, effectively being on call for two workloads.
  • Grievants kept contact via cell phones and were required to make immediate nursing decisions even when away from their regular sites.
  • Arbitrator Skonier held that compensatory time was due under Article XVI, §J of the CBA, because grievants covered absent duties in addition to their own.
  • LIU challenged the award on PERA managerial prerogatives, CBA interpretation, and the scope of the compensatory time provision; the court reviewed under the Essence Test.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the award is within the CBA and triggers compensatory time LIU LIU Award within CBA; compensatory time applies
Whether the arbitrator’s interpretation can be derived from the CBA LIU LIU Yes; rationally derived from the CBA
Whether reviewing court should overturn under Essence Test LIU LIU Court defers to arbitrator if rationally connected to CBA; uphold award
Whether the award improperly limits managerial prerogatives under PERA LIU LIU Award does not improperly limit prerogatives; respects CBA terms
Whether the nurses could be in two places at once under the CBA LIU LIU Location not required by provision; second duties trigger compensatory time

Key Cases Cited

  • Westmoreland Intermediate Unit #7 v. Westmoreland Intermediate Unit #7 Classroom Assistants Educational Support Personnel Association, PSEA/NEA, 595 Pa. 648 (2007) (Essence Test framework for PERA arbitration review)
  • State System of Higher Education v. State College University Professional Association (PSEA/NEA), 560 Pa. 135 (1999) (Essence Test standard; deferential review of arbitration awards)
  • Community College of Beaver County v. Community College of Beaver County Society of Faculty (PSEA/NEA), 473 Pa. 576 (1977) (Arbiter review limited to contract interpretation and rational flow from CBA)
  • Danville Area School District v. Danville Area Education Association, PSEA/NEA, 754 A.2d 1258 (2000) (CBA language covering compensatory time for dual duties)
  • Cheyney University v. State System of Higher Education, PSEA-NEA, 560 Pa. 135 (1999) (Essence Test articulates scope of arbitration review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Luzerne Intermediate Unit No. 18 v. Luzerne Intermediate Unit Education Ass'n
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County
Date Published: Dec 29, 2010
Citations: 2010 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 671; 20 Pa. D. & C.5th 256; no. 10848 of 2010
Docket Number: no. 10848 of 2010
Log In