Lusk v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
15-1190
Fed. Cl.Apr 27, 2017Background
- Petitioner Alicia Lusk filed a Vaccine Act petition alleging left arm pain caused by a November 1, 2013 influenza vaccination.
- The Special Master issued a decision on September 21, 2016 awarding compensation to Lusk based on respondent’s proffer.
- Lusk moved for attorneys’ fees and costs on December 6, 2016, seeking $20,998.30 in fees, $1,020.06 in attorneys’ costs, and $73.90 in petitioner out-of-pocket costs (total $22,092.26).
- Respondent stated she had no role in fee resolution but agreed statutory requirements for an award were met and deferred to the Special Master’s discretion on the amount.
- The Special Master reviewed the billing records, found the request reasonable, and declined to reduce hours or rates.
- The Special Master awarded $22,018.36 (fees and counsel costs) jointly to petitioner and counsel, and $73.90 to petitioner, and directed entry of judgment.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether petitioner is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs under the Vaccine Act | Lusk argued the fees and costs submitted were reasonable and should be awarded in full | Respondent did not contest entitlement; noted respondent has no role in fee determination but agreed statutory requirements were satisfied and deferred to Special Master discretion | Awarded fees and costs in full as requested; no reductions to hours or rates |
| Whether submitted billing entries and rates were reasonable | Lusk contended billing records and rates were reasonable and necessary | Respondent did not challenge reasonableness | Special Master reviewed records, found them reasonable, and made no reductions |
| Form of award and payees | Lusk requested reimbursement for counsel and out-of-pocket costs | Respondent did not oppose form of award | Special Master ordered lump sum to be paid jointly to petitioner and counsel for fees/costs and a separate check to petitioner for out-of-pocket expenses |
| Scope of award (whether it covers all legal expenses) | Lusk sought an award covering all legal fees and advanced costs | Respondent silent on scope beyond statutory compliance | Special Master clarified award is intended to cover all legal expenses and prevents additional attorney charges per § 15(e)(3) |
Key Cases Cited
- Beck v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (attorney fee awards under the Vaccine Act encompass all charges and prevent attorneys from collecting additional fees beyond the statutory award)
