History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lusk v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
15-1190
Fed. Cl.
Apr 27, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner Alicia Lusk filed a Vaccine Act petition alleging left arm pain caused by a November 1, 2013 influenza vaccination.
  • The Special Master issued a decision on September 21, 2016 awarding compensation to Lusk based on respondent’s proffer.
  • Lusk moved for attorneys’ fees and costs on December 6, 2016, seeking $20,998.30 in fees, $1,020.06 in attorneys’ costs, and $73.90 in petitioner out-of-pocket costs (total $22,092.26).
  • Respondent stated she had no role in fee resolution but agreed statutory requirements for an award were met and deferred to the Special Master’s discretion on the amount.
  • The Special Master reviewed the billing records, found the request reasonable, and declined to reduce hours or rates.
  • The Special Master awarded $22,018.36 (fees and counsel costs) jointly to petitioner and counsel, and $73.90 to petitioner, and directed entry of judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether petitioner is entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs under the Vaccine Act Lusk argued the fees and costs submitted were reasonable and should be awarded in full Respondent did not contest entitlement; noted respondent has no role in fee determination but agreed statutory requirements were satisfied and deferred to Special Master discretion Awarded fees and costs in full as requested; no reductions to hours or rates
Whether submitted billing entries and rates were reasonable Lusk contended billing records and rates were reasonable and necessary Respondent did not challenge reasonableness Special Master reviewed records, found them reasonable, and made no reductions
Form of award and payees Lusk requested reimbursement for counsel and out-of-pocket costs Respondent did not oppose form of award Special Master ordered lump sum to be paid jointly to petitioner and counsel for fees/costs and a separate check to petitioner for out-of-pocket expenses
Scope of award (whether it covers all legal expenses) Lusk sought an award covering all legal fees and advanced costs Respondent silent on scope beyond statutory compliance Special Master clarified award is intended to cover all legal expenses and prevents additional attorney charges per § 15(e)(3)

Key Cases Cited

  • Beck v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (attorney fee awards under the Vaccine Act encompass all charges and prevent attorneys from collecting additional fees beyond the statutory award)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lusk v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Apr 27, 2017
Docket Number: 15-1190
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.