History
  • No items yet
midpage
2012 COA 112
Colo. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2008, a nine-year-old girl injured her arm on a playground apparatus at Black Rock Elementary School during recess.
  • Plaintiffs Randy and Mary Loveland sue the school district (public entity) alleging premises liability and negligent supervision.
  • The trial court granted a 12(b)(1) dismissal, ruling no waiver of immunity for the playground apparatus or negligent supervision.
  • The court held the playground apparatus was not a “public facility” under the Governmental Immunity Act and that negligent supervision was not an express waiver.
  • The appellate court reverses on the public facility issue, but affirms dismissal of negligent supervision, and remands for further proceedings on the public facility issue.
  • The apparatus was owned, operated, and maintained by the school district and located in a public recreation area; the question is whether it falls within the Act’s public facility waiver.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the playground apparatus is a public facility under the Act Loveland: apparatus is a public facility. District: not a public facility. Yes; apparatus is a public facility under the Act.
Whether negligent supervision is waivable under the Act Negligent supervision creates a waiver via dangerous condition. No express waiver for negligent supervision. No waiver; negligent supervision barred.

Key Cases Cited

  • Evans v. Board of County Comm'rs, 174 Colo. 97, 482 P.2d 968 (Colo. 1971) (recognizes potential statutory reestablishment of immunity and prospective application)
  • Flournoy v. School Dist. No. 1, 174 Colo. 110, 482 P.2d 966 (Colo. 1971) (part of the immunity trilogy abrogating common law immunity)
  • Proffitt v. State, 174 Colo. 113, 482 P.2d 965 (Colo. 1971) (part of the immunity trilogy)
  • Rosales v. City & Cnty. of Denver, 89 P.3d 507 (Colo. App. 2004) (natural features not public facilities; public facility meaning depends on public ownership and function)
  • City & County of Denver v. Gallegos, 916 P.2d 509 (Colo. 1996) (public facility determination based on public benefit)
  • Destefano v. Grabrian, 763 P.2d 275 (Colo. 1988) (origin of negligent supervision doctrine and employer duty)
  • Lopez v. Regional Transp. Dist., 899 P.2d 254 (Colo. App. 1994) (restricts implied waivers; requires express language)
  • Mountain States Tel. & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Highways, 869 P.2d 1289 (Colo. 1994) (statutory waiver confines immunity to express exceptions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Loveland ex rel. Loveland v. St. Vrain Valley School District Re-1J
Court Name: Colorado Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 5, 2012
Citations: 2012 COA 112; 328 P.3d 228; 2012 Colo. App. LEXIS 1080; 2012 WL 2581034; No. 11CA1019
Docket Number: No. 11CA1019
Court Abbreviation: Colo. Ct. App.
Log In
    Loveland ex rel. Loveland v. St. Vrain Valley School District Re-1J, 2012 COA 112