midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
92 So. 3d 1018
La. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Huertas, an employee of Support Systems, was injured in a July 28, 2009, motor-vehicle collision while in the course and scope of employment; LWCC paid workers’ compensation benefits to Huertas.
  • LWCC filed suit on April 5–July 15, 2010, naming Devin Landry, Atlay Stelly, Rodger Shelton, and Farm Bureau (Landry’s insurer) as defendants, seeking reimbursement of benefits paid.
  • Farm Bureau asserted a credit under LSA-R.S. 32:866 (“no pay-no play”) because Huertas’s vehicle carried no compulsory liability insurance.
  • Farm Bureau moved for summary judgment arguing LWCC could not recover the first $10,000 under 32:866, and LWCC stood in Huertas’s shoes for purposes of subrogation.
  • Trial court granted summary judgment in Farm Bureau’s favor, holding LWCC precluded from recovering the first $10,000; LWCC appeals.
  • Court reviews summary judgments de novo and applies statutory construction to 32:866 and related workers’ compensation provisions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether no pay-no play can be asserted against LWCC. LWCC contends no pay-no play only against uninsured vehicle owners. Farm Bureau argues 32:866 applies to insurers seeking recovery. No; 32:866(F) permits insurer subrogation rights, so LWCC is barred from first $10,000.
Whether LWCC stands in Huertas's shoes for subrogation. LWCC acts independently, not as Huertas’s substitute. LWCC’s rights are conditioned on Huertas’s right to recover against tortfeasor. LWCC’s recovery limited to what Huertas could recover; first $10,000 barred.
Whether the court erred by analogizing 32:866 to comparative negligence. LWCC argues no genuine issue of material fact remains. Court properly applied de novo review and statute; no material fact controverts the law. No error; no genuine issue exists; summary judgment affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Progressive Security Insurance Co. v. Foster, 711 So.2d 675 (La. 1998) (interprets no-pay-no-play; motorist without coverage cannot recover first $10,000)
  • Marquette Casualty Co. v. Brown, 103 So.2d 269 (La. 1958) (insurer's right of reimbursement limited to amount tortfeasor pays)
  • Gardner v. State, Dep’t of Education, 844 So.2d 311 (La.App.1st Cir. 2003) (statutory interpretation and de novo review guidance for legal questions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. v. Landry
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: May 2, 2012
Citations: 92 So. 3d 1018; 2011 La.App. 1 Cir. 1973; 2012 WL 1536283; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 734; No. 2011 CA 1973
Docket Number: No. 2011 CA 1973
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In