History
  • No items yet
midpage
619 S.W.3d 651
Tex.
2021
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner Louis Hinojos received a partial, timely insurance payment from State Farm for a first-party property claim; State Farm later agreed to pay a higher amount following appraisal or further adjustment.
  • The central statutory framework is the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act (TPPCA), Tex. Ins. Code ch. 542, which imposes penalties when an insurer "delays payment of a claim."
  • The legal dispute asks whether a timely partial payment that is later supplemented constitutes a "delay[] payment of the claim" under §542.058(a), exposing the insurer to TPPCA penalties.
  • The Texas Supreme Court majority held the insurer could be liable even after an initial timely partial payment; Justice Blacklock filed a dissent rejecting that interpretation.
  • Justice Blacklock argues prior decisions the majority relies on (Barbara Tech, Ortiz, Alvarez, and Mex-Tex) do not squarely resolve whether a timely partial payment itself avoids prompt-pay liability when a later supplemental payment is made.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a timely partial payment followed later by a higher payment constitutes a "delay[] payment of the claim" under §542.058(a) Hinojos: later supplemental payment shows insurer delayed payment and triggers TPPCA penalties State Farm: the initial timely payment satisfied statutory deadlines; later supplementation does not retroactively create a "delay" Majority: insurer can be liable under TPPCA despite an initial timely partial payment; Dissent (Blacklock): a timely payment of part of a claim is not a "delay" and should discharge prompt-pay duty

Key Cases Cited

  • Barbara Technologies Corp. v. State Farm Lloyds, 589 S.W.3d 806 (Tex. 2019) (held payment of an appraisal award does not as a matter of law bar TPPCA claims)
  • Ortiz v. State Farm Lloyds, 589 S.W.3d 127 (Tex. 2019) (summarized Barbara Tech and affirmed that appraisal-initiated payments do not automatically defeat TPPCA claims)
  • Alvarez v. State Farm Lloyds, 601 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. 2020) (per curiam) (involved partial payment within TPPCA deadline; appraisal/payment of award did not resolve TPPCA liability)
  • Republic Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc., 150 S.W.3d 423 (Tex. 2004) (interpreted "claim" in predecessor statute and limited TPPCA damages to the amount owed when the prompt-pay clock ran)
  • Breshears v. State Farm Lloyds, 155 S.W.3d 340 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2004, pet. denied) (held initial timely payment satisfied prompt-pay statute despite later appraisal-based supplementation)
  • Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. Wittig, 876 S.W.2d 304 (Tex. 1994) (principle that courts are not bound by unstated or implied holdings on issues not squarely addressed)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Louis Hinojos v. State Farm Lloyds and Raul Pulido
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 19, 2021
Citations: 619 S.W.3d 651; 19-0280
Docket Number: 19-0280
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
Log In
    Louis Hinojos v. State Farm Lloyds and Raul Pulido, 619 S.W.3d 651