Longjaw v. State
288 P.3d 210
Mont.2012Background
- Longjaw was convicted by jury of aggravated burglary and sexual intercourse without consent in the Fourth Judicial District Court.
- Standby counsel raised a potential conflict because a key witness had prior representation by the public defender’s office; the court did not conduct a full conflict inquiry.
- During jury deliberations the court modified jury instruction 7 from 'enters and remains unlawfully' to 'enters or remains unlawfully' and similarly altered instruction 8.
- Longjaw eventually represented himself at trial after the court denied his request for self-representation; Kilby and Hood served as standby counsel.
- The State conceded reversible error on the instruction issue, leading to reversal of the aggravated burglary conviction, while the sexual intercourse without consent conviction was affirmed; the matter was remanded for an amended judgment.
- On the remaining issues, the court held there was no actual standby-counsel conflict warranting reversal of the sexual conviction, and the ineffective-assistance claim regarding an independent medical expert could not be reviewed on direct appeal and must pursue postconviction relief.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standby counsel conflict reversibility | Longjaw argues standby counsel had an actual conflict mandating reversal. | Longjaw contends conflict affected representation. | No actual conflict; reversal not required on sexual conviction |
| Ineffective assistance for not obtaining medical expert | Longjaw asserts failure to obtain independent medical opinion prejudiced defense. | Counsel's failure constitutes ineffective assistance. | Not reviewable on direct appeal; pursue postconviction relief |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. St. Dennis, 2010 MT 229 (Mont. 2010) (conflict-free representation; case-by-case approach for public defenders)
- Holloway v. Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475 (1984) (automatic reversal when conflict of interest infringes Sixth Amendment)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (two-pronged test for ineffective assistance)
- State v. Deschon, 2004 MT 32, 320 Mont. 1, 85 P.3d 756 (Mont. 2004) (ineffective-assistance framework; record-based review limitations)
- State v. St. Dennis, 2010 MT 229, 358 Mont. 88, 244 P.3d 292 (Mont. 2010) (conflict-free representation; case-by-case approach for OPD conflicts)
- State v. Dethman, 2010 MT 268, 358 Mont. 384, 245 P.3d 30 (Mont. 2010) (adequate initial inquiry into allegations of conflict)
- State v. Happel, 2010 MT 200, 357 Mont. 390, 240 P.3d 1016 (Mont. 2010) (initial inquiry into conflicts and representational adequacy)
- McDonald v. Washington, 22 P.3d 791 (Wash. 2001) (standby counsel conflicts require inquiry; prejudice presumed when actual conflict)
