Lliguichuzhca v. Cinema 60, LLC
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79543
S.D.N.Y.2013Background
- Plaintiffs sued defendants for FLSA and NYLL violations.
- Bench trial conducted March 4–5, 2013, resulting in liability findings for plaintiffs.
- Damages were calculated, with plaintiffs’ counsel submitting a proposed total.
- Settling parties sought court approval of a Full Release of All Claims.
- Settlement proposed to pay $60,000 for dismissal with prejudice and broad releases.
- Court requested and reviewed information on distribution and attorney’s fees; settlement approved and case dismissed with prejudice.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether FLSA settlement requires judicial approval. | Lliguiehuzhca contends approval is appropriate due to negotiated settlement. | Galanis/Man-ikes argue discretion on approval varies by jurisdiction. | Court proceeds with approval framework for fairness. |
| Whether the settlement is fair and reasonable under FLSA standards. | Settlement reflects compromise given collectability concerns. | Settlement should be preferred if it avoids overreach and preserves rights. | Court finds the settlement fair and reasonable. |
| Whether attorneys’ fees within the settlement are reasonable. | Counsel’s fees should not exceed fair share given results. | Fees should reflect negotiated outcome and efficiency. | Court approves fees as reasonable within the negotiated settlement. |
| Whether the settlement adequately protects plaintiffs’ interests given collectability issues. | Collectability concerns support settlement at a conservative amount. | Ability to collect against defendants is uncertain without settlement. | Court emphasizes collectability as a factor favoring approval. |
Key Cases Cited
- Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982) (settlement of wage claims requires fair and reasonable compromise of disputed issues)
