Livermore v. Madison County Judge
2014 Ark. App. 617
| Ark. Ct. App. | 2014Background
- Livermore worked for Madison County Sheriff’s Office as secretary/jail administrator; basement mold from 2008 flood led to remediation and testing.
- Remediation included mold removal, floors, paint, lowered ceilings, HVAC improvements, and final testing showing acceptable mold levels in January 2009.
- Employees returned to basement but Livermore testified mold appeared again from August 2008 through June 2011; March–April 2011 flood occurred with May 2011 testing again showing acceptable levels.
- Laurie McConnell testified the basement flooded again in April 2011; testing in May 2011 indicated acceptable mold levels, with notes about effervescence mistaken for mold.
- ALJ found last injurious exposure to mold was no later than September 30, 2008, and Livermore did not file with the Commission until at least May 25, 2011; claim barred by Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-702(2)(A).
- Standard of review requires affirming if substantial evidence supports the Commission’s denial of relief.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timeliness of claim under statute | Livermore argues last injurious exposure occurred later (June 2011). | Glover argues last injurious exposure was October 2008, filing May 2011 is outside two-year limit. | Claim barred by statute of limitations; timely filing not shown. |
| Substantial evidence supporting last exposure finding | Livermore contends continued mold exposure after remediation. | Agency favored testing showing acceptable levels; Boyd's testing given little weight. | Substantial evidence supports the Commission's last exposure finding and timeliness ruling. |
Key Cases Cited
- Martin Charcoal, Inc. v. Britt, 102 Ark. App. 252, 284 S.W.3d 91 (Ark. App. 2008) (establishes substantial-evidence standard for review)
- Loar v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 2014 Ark. App. 240 (Ark. App. 2014) (sets framework for reviewing denial of relief)
