History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lisboa v. Tramer
2012 Ohio 1549
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Lisboa sued Tramer & Zwick in 2010 for professional malpractice, legal malpractice, fraud, conspiracy, and related claims.
  • Lisboa, a resident alien, was deported in 2005 after a divorce and criminal convictions related to a business sale.
  • Lisboa alleges Tramer filed a false 2005 Schedule K-1 to IRS, creating an IRS lien against him.
  • Trial court granted a dismissals on statute-of-limitations and pleading grounds; issues appealed to the Ohio Court of Appeals.
  • Court of Appeals affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.
  • Key issues include accrual of professional negligence claims, pleading specificity for fraud, and discovery rules for negligent supervision.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Accrual of professional negligence claim Lisboa contends accrual occurred when act was committed; timing unclear on K-1. Tramer contends accrual by 2005 event; statute expired by 2009-2010. Accrual uncertain; remanded to determine timeliness.
Pleading with specificity for fraud Civ.R. 9(B) not satisfied; fraud pleaded generally by third-party reliance. Fraud must be pled with particularity detailing statements and making them to plaintiff. Fraud claim dismissed for lack of particularity.
Negligent supervision statute of limitations Discovery rule tolls the two-year period for injury under negligent supervision. Limitations bar unless timely discovered the injury; assertion insufficiently pled. Dismissal reversed; discovery rule applied to toll limitations.
Intentional infliction of emotional distress Tramer's conduct caused severe emotional distress via IRS actions. Not properly pled or time-barred under other theories. Survives with proper pleading; later disposition affirmed in part.

Key Cases Cited

  • Flagstar Bank, F.S.B. v. Airline Union’s Mtge. Co., 128 Ohio St.3d 529 (2011-Ohio-1961) (professional negligence accrual based on act committed)
  • Investors REIT One v. Jacobs, 46 Ohio St.3d 176 (1989) (accrual for professional negligence; accrual occurs at act)
  • O’Brien v. Univ. Community Tenants Union, 42 Ohio St.2d 242 (1975) (motion to dismiss standard; pleadings and reasonable inferences)
  • Salamon v. Taft Broadcasting Co., 16 Ohio App.3d 336 (1984) (notice pleading standard vs. specific allegations; Civ.R. 8 vs. 9(B))
  • Browning v. Burt, 66 Ohio St.3d 544 (1993) (discovery rule applicable to negligent misrepresentation/related claims)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lisboa v. Tramer
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 5, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 1549
Docket Number: 97526
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.