History
  • No items yet
midpage
2012 Ohio 6281
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Liquidation Properties filed a foreclosure action against Tina and Tim Mosley in 2009.
  • The parties reached a July 2010 Consent Judgment where Mosleys were in default and Liquidation Properties agreed not to pursue a sheriff’s sale before December 4, 2010, while reviewing options for settlement.
  • A sheriff’s sale was ordered, but Mosleys filed for bankruptcy four days before the sale; bankruptcy stay was later vacated in 2011.
  • In June 2011 Liquidation Properties assigned the mortgage to Aspen Shackleton III LLC and moved to substitute Aspen Shackleton as the plaintiffs.
  • Liquidation Properties later sought to appeal a Civ.R. 60(B) ruling granting relief from judgment to Mosleys; Aspen Shackleton was not a party to the appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Liquidation Properties has standing to appeal the Civ.R. 60(B) order Liquidation Properties asserts an appeal as the foreclosing party. Aspen Shackleton, as the current holder, is the proper party with standing; LP lacks interest. LP lacks standing; appeal is dismissed.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Forfeiture of John Deere Tractor, 2006-Ohio-388 (4th Dist. 2006) (standing is jurisdictional; aggrieved party required to appeal)
  • In re Estate of Jones, 2009-Ohio-4457 (4th Dist. 2009) (standing requires present interest prejudiced by lower-court decision)
  • Battersby v. Lake Cty., 2006-Ohio-6873 (11th Dist. 2006) (transferring interest defeats standing to pursue appeal)
  • Willoughby Hills v. C.C. Bar’s Sahara, 64 Ohio St.3d 24, 591 N.E.2d 1203 (1992) (standing requires aggrieved party with rights affected)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Liquidation Properties v. Mosley
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 27, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 6281; 11CA3453
Docket Number: 11CA3453
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    Liquidation Properties v. Mosley, 2012 Ohio 6281