History
  • No items yet
midpage
702 F.3d 1055
8th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • DM & E, a railroad, contracted with Corman to install rail under a Contractor Work Agreement (CWA).
  • CWA includes an indemnity clause: Corman defends and indemnifies DM & E for negligent performance by Corman or its workers.
  • Lexington Insurance issued a policy naming DM & E as additional insured, but Corman retained a $250,000 self-insured retention.
  • Corman’s policy exclusions barred coverage for bodily injury to an employee arising out of the employee’s employment, with an insured contract exception for post-contract damages.
  • Lieffort, a DM & E employee-in-charge, was injured while assisting with tie fires on the project; injury occurred May 16, 2007.
  • DM & E sued Lieffort’s claims under FELA against DM & E, sought defense/indemnification from Corman, which refused; district court granted summary judgment for Corman.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether indemnity covers FELA claims. DM & E argues indemnity includes FELA claims. Corman argues indemnity covers only Corman’s negligent conduct. Indemnity does not extend to FELA claims absent Corman negligence.
Whether Lexington policy covers Lieffort’s injury under insured contract. DM & E contends insured contract extends coverage. Corman argues indemnity does not render Corman liable for DM & E’s own negligence; insured contract not triggered. Policy does not cover because the indemnity clause contemplates Corman’s negligence, not DM & E’s.

Key Cases Cited

  • Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Hughes Bros., Inc., 671 F.2d 279 (8th Cir. 1982) (indemnity intended to cover railroad’s nondelegable duty; not broad FELA liability)
  • Burlington Northern, Inc. v. Bellaire Corp., 921 F.2d 760 (8th Cir. 1990) (indemnity broad only for acts/omissions; favors no FELA extension)
  • S. Ry. Co. v. Ga. Kraft Co., 823 F.2d 478 (11th Cir. 1987) (insulated discussion on whether indemnity covers FELA when contract references negligence only)
  • Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. International Paper Co., 618 F.2d 492 (8th Cir. 1980) (settlement of FELA claim not conclusive of liability absent indemnity terms)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lieffort v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 7, 2013
Citations: 702 F.3d 1055; 2013 WL 57877; No. 12-2043
Docket Number: No. 12-2043
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
Log In
    Lieffort v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad, 702 F.3d 1055