History
  • No items yet
midpage
919 F. Supp. 2d 17
D.D.C.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • LG sued Obayashi/Sakae Tanaka and Naoto Hirota over alleged misappropriation of LG’s trade secrets and related patent ownership claims; Korea’s Supreme Court held the April 2004 settlement valid and ordered transfer of patent rights to LG, which LG now seeks to enforce in the U.S.; this federal case includes seven counts, including enforcement of the Korean judgment and various common-law claims; Tanaka moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction; LG moved for partial summary judgment recognizing the Korean judgment; defendants moved to dismiss Counts V–VII under forum non conveniens; the court denied a stay and denied some relief while granting part of LG’s comity relief and Tanaka’s Rule 12(b)(2) motion

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court should stay this federal action pending Japanese litigation LG favored staying Tanaka favored stay Denied stay; proceed with litigation
Whether the court has personal jurisdiction over Tanaka LG asserts jurisdiction under D.C. long-arm Tanaka lacks minimum contacts Dismissal granted for lack of personal jurisdiction
Whether the Korean judgment should be recognized under comity LG seeks recognition to enforce patents Defendants challenge validity under contract principles Korean judgment recognized in part; comity applied; some scope issues reserved for later
Whether Counts V–VII should be dismissed under forum non conveniens LG argues ongoing federal patent issues remain Counts V–VII should be dismissed if comity resolves core issues Denied without prejudice

Key Cases Cited

  • Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. 113 (1895) (full faith in foreign judgments; merits not retried in U.S.)
  • Medellin v. Dretke, 544 U.S. 660 (2005) (public policy exception to comity is narrow)
  • World Wide Minerals v. Republic of Kazakhstan, 296 F.3d 1154 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (conspiracy/jurisdictional theories require particularized pleading)
  • Laker Airways, Ltd. v. Sabena, Belgian World Airlines, 731 F.2d 909 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (comity factors and parallel foreign proceedings guidance)
  • Mwani v. Bin Laden, 417 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (minimum contacts/long-arm in federal-question cases)
  • Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 589 F. Supp. 1182 (D.D.C. 1984) (government contacts doctrine limitations for jurisdiction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lg Display Co., Ltd v. Obayashi Seikou Co., Ltd.
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: Jan 28, 2013
Citations: 919 F. Supp. 2d 17; 2013 WL 314760; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10785; Civil Action No. 2011-1637
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2011-1637
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.
Log In
    Lg Display Co., Ltd v. Obayashi Seikou Co., Ltd., 919 F. Supp. 2d 17