midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
590 B.R. 895
8th Cir. BAP
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Debtor Brian Lerbakken retained counsel in 2014 for divorce; the marital settlement awarded him one-half of his ex-wife’s Wells Fargo 401(k) and an entire IRA, and directed entry of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) that was never obtained.
  • Lerbakken never acquired title or possession of the accounts after the divorce; Sieloff & Associates (his former counsel) remained listed as a creditor for unpaid fees.
  • Lerbakken filed a Chapter 7 petition on January 23, 2018 and claimed exemptions in the disputed 401(k) and IRA on Schedule C as retirement funds.
  • Sieloff objected to the exemptions, arguing the Accounts were not exempt retirement funds under federal law.
  • The bankruptcy court disallowed the exemptions under the Clark v. Rameker framework, concluding the Accounts were not "retirement funds" for § 522(d)(12)/(b)(3)(C).
  • Lerbakken appealed; the district court reviewed the legal question de novo and affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order.

Issues

Issue Lerbakken's Argument Sieloff's Argument Held
Whether Lerbakken may exempt his interest in the 401(k) and IRA under federal retirement-fund exemption The Accounts are marital retirement savings (ex-wife’s pre-/during-marriage contributions) and are effectively retirement funds he will use at retirement; tax treatment inures to him The Accounts are not "retirement funds" as defined by Clark; Lerbakken’s interest arose by property settlement and he did not contribute to or hold the accounts as retirement savings The accounts do not qualify as "retirement funds" under Clark; exemption disallowed

Key Cases Cited

  • Clark v. Rameker, 573 U.S. 122 (Sup. Ct. 2014) (ordinary meaning of "retirement funds" limits exemption to sums set aside for one’s own retirement)
  • Rice v. Allard (In re Rice), 478 B.R. 275 (E.D. Mich. 2012) (both retirement-character and tax-exempt-account elements required for § 522(d)(12) exemption)
  • Rucker v. Belew (In re Belew), 588 B.R. 875 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2018) (de novo review of legal entitlement to exemption)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lerbakken v. Sieloff & Assocs., P.A. (In re Lerbakken)
Court Name: United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 16, 2018
Citations: 590 B.R. 895; No. 18-6018
Docket Number: No. 18-6018
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir. BAP
Log In