History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lepisto v. Senior Lifestyle Newport Ltd. Partnership
78 So. 3d 89
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Jack Lepisto, a resident of Newport Place, had Nancy as his durable power of attorney.
  • Nancy signed the Assisted Living Community Contract on Jack’s behalf, designating her as Financially Responsible Party and possibly Resident’s Representative.
  • An Addendum to the Contract provided for arbitration of disputes exceeding $15,000 under AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules.
  • Jack was injured after moving in; the Lepistos sued Newport Place, which moved to compel arbitration under the Addendum and the trial court granted.
  • The Lepistos argued Nancy signed only as Financially Responsible Party, not as Jack’s Representative, so arbitration should not bind Jack or all claims.
  • The appellate court granted rehearing, reversed on the first issue, and remanded; other issues were not reached.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was Nancy bound as Jack’s representative to arbitrate? Nancy signed as Financially Responsible Party only, not as Resident’s Representative. Contract layout shows Nancy acted in dual capacity; signing above title indicates representation. Reversed on this issue; Nancy did not sign as Representative.
Is the arbitration agreement enforceable against Jack if Nancy did not sign as his representative? Nancy’s representative status should bind Jack as she signed the Addendum. No, because Nancy did not sign in the capacity of Jack’s Representative; arbitration as to Jack fails. Not reached
Who decides arbitrability when signatory capacity is contested? Arbitrability should be decided by arbitrator if agreement clearly applies. Court decides arbitrability when contract formation is in dispute; expert precedents apply. Not reached
Does the Consolidated Resources reasoning apply to bind the non-signing party? Non-signing party can be bound by assent through conduct and performance. No evidence Jack assented; payments were made by Nancy as Financially Responsible Party. Not reached

Key Cases Cited

  • Fletcher v. Huntington Place Limited Partnership, 952 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (signing capacity determines arbitration binding)
  • Central National Bank of Miami v. Muskat Corp. of America, Inc., 430 So.2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (individual liability cannot be defeated by labeling capacity)
  • Stalley v. Transitional Hosp. Corp. of Tampa, 44 So.3d 627 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (agency-based binding of non-signatories to arbitration)
  • Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440 (U.S. 2006) (court, not arbitrator, decides contract existence; validity)
  • First Options of Chicago Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (U.S. 1995) (arbitrability generally for court unless clear agreement otherwise)
  • Terminix International Company v. Palmer Ranch Limited Partnership, 432 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 2005) (incorporation of AAA rules can assign arbitrability to arbitrator)
  • Consolidated Resources Healthcare Fund I, Ltd. v. Fenelus, 853 So.2d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (assent via conduct can bind non-signatory in some contexts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lepisto v. Senior Lifestyle Newport Ltd. Partnership
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 25, 2012
Citation: 78 So. 3d 89
Docket Number: No. 4D10-16
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.