History
  • No items yet
midpage
2015 Ohio 287
Ohio Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • David and Janie Lehman divorced in 1998; their separation agreement required David to pay one-half of post-high-school education costs for their two sons until age 24.
  • Disputes arose over unpaid shared college expenses and student loans; Janie sought contempt and reimbursement for amounts she paid on the sons’ loans.
  • A 2005 contempt finding was later vacated; an agreed 2007 entry set monthly payments into a college expense account and resolved certain past amounts.
  • Janie filed further contempt motions in 2008 and 2012; after hearings and an appeal (Lehman I), this Court remanded instructing a proper arrearage calculation.
  • On remand the trial court calculated an arrearage and initially ordered David to reimburse future one-half loan payments; this aspect was reversed in a subsequent appeal (Lehman II).
  • After additional proceedings, the trial court (March 21, 2014) denied contempt but modified the 2007 entry, ordering David to pay a reduced arrearage and to reimburse one-half of any amounts Janie pays on previously incurred student loans upon proof of payment; David appealed.

Issues

Issue Janie (Plaintiff) Argument David (Defendant) Argument Held
Whether trial court erred by ordering David to reimburse one-half of amounts Janie pays on sons’ existing student loans Court may enforce separation agreement; Janie asked reimbursement for one-half of loan payments she actually makes Trial court exceeded prior orders and scope of remand; had already been ordered to pay all past arrearages Affirmed: trial court did not err in ordering reimbursement plan; enforcement/modification was within court’s power

Key Cases Cited

  • Tennant v. Martin–Auer, 188 Ohio App.3d 768, 936 N.E.2d 1013 (Ohio App. 2010) (appellate role limited to reviewing whether evidence supports trial court findings)
  • Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories, 61 Ohio St.2d 197, 400 N.E.2d 384 (Ohio 1980) (appellate presumption of regularity when record/transcript is absent)
  • Jefferies v. Stanzak, 135 Ohio App.3d 176, 733 N.E.2d 305 (Ohio App. 1999) (trial court has power to enforce decree and order payment of support arrearages)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lehman v. Lehman
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 26, 2015
Citations: 2015 Ohio 287; 14 CA 30
Docket Number: 14 CA 30
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    Lehman v. Lehman, 2015 Ohio 287