Leeks v. State
309 Ga. App. 724
Ga. Ct. App.2011Background
- Victim, 19, testified Leeks approached her selling hats, offered different payments, then offered a sack of crack for sex; victim refused.
- Leeks produced a gun, pressed it to the victim's head, grabbed her neck, fired but the gun misfired, and told her to leave.
- Victim fled, later identified Leeks in a photo at hospital after recognizing him from neighborhood familiarity.
- Police used victim's identification and neighborhood corroboration to arrest Leeks; warrant obtained for Leeks's apartment.
- Air pistol found in Leeks's apartment; victim identified air pistol as the firearm Leeks pointed at her.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of evidence for identity | Leeks contends State failed to identify him as the assailant | State presented sufficient evidence under Jackson v. Virginia | Evidence sufficient beyond reasonable doubt |
| Pre-trial identification suppression | Show-up with a single photo was impermissibly suggestive | Identification procedure reliable under circumstances | Denial of suppression upheld; not impermissibly suggestive |
| Jury instruction on witness certainty | Instruction allowing certainty level violated Brodes | No objection; instruction waived | Waived; no reversible error |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. Supreme Court, 1979) (sufficiency standard for criminal conviction)
- Crawford v. State, 297 Ga.App. 187, 676 S.E.2d 843 (Ga. Ct. App., 2009) (reliability of eyewitness identification factors)
- Wright v. State, 302 Ga.App. 101, 690 S.E.2d 220 (Ga. Ct. App., 2010) (showup identification analysis)
- McBride v. State, 297 Ga.App. 421, 677 S.E.2d 438 (Ga. Ct. App., 2009) (factors for reliability of identification)
- Jennings v. State, 277 Ga.App. 159, 626 S.E.2d 155 (Ga. Ct. App., 2006) (identification reliable under circumstances)
- Bartlett v. State, 244 Ga.App. 49, 537 S.E.2d 362 (Ga. Ct. App., 2000) (identification reliability considerations)
