History
  • No items yet
midpage
317 Ga. 880
Ga.
2023
Read the full case

Background

  • Edward Lee was convicted for malice murder and multiple other crimes during a crime spree between December 2011 and January 2012 in Georgia.
  • The indictment included murder, armed robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, and weapons charges, among others.
  • Key evidence included eyewitness testimony, co-indictee (Scott) testimony, physical evidence, and identifications.
  • Lee appealed, raising claims related to mistrial denials (references to his prior incarceration and alleged Brady violation) and ineffective assistance of counsel during closing argument.
  • The trial court denied Lee's post-trial motions; Lee appealed these denials.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Denial of mistrial for reference to prior prison Scott referenced Lee's prior incarceration, prejudicing Lee's case State tried to avoid the topic; Lee failed to promptly object Waived—motion not contemporaneous
Denial of mistrial for Brady violation State did not disclose info about a fourth man (Chris) at the scene No evidence State withheld info; learned name at trial; late motion Waived—motion not contemporaneous
Ineffective assistance: prosecutor’s closing arg. Counsel failed to object to improper comments on witness veracity and facts not in evidence State’s comments were fair inference and within wide latitude No deficiency; objections without merit

Key Cases Cited

  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (deficient performance and prejudice required for ineffective assistance)
  • Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) (prosecutorial duty to disclose exculpatory evidence)
  • Neloms v. State, 313 Ga. 781 (2022) (mistrial motion must be made contemporaneously)
  • Kilpatrick v. State, 308 Ga. 194 (2020) (waiver of mistrial issues where motion untimely)
  • Jackson v. State, 301 Ga. 774 (2017) (wide latitude given to prosecutors in closing arguments)
  • Cochran v. State, 305 Ga. 827 (2019) (failure to object must be objectively unreasonable to be deficient)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lee v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 19, 2023
Citations: 317 Ga. 880; 896 S.E.2d 524; S23A1097
Docket Number: S23A1097
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
Log In