History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ledford v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections
2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8554
| 11th Cir. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • J.W. Ledford Jr., sentenced to death for a 1992 murder, filed a § 1983 suit five days before his scheduled execution (May 16, 2017) challenging Georgia’s single‑drug lethal injection protocol (5,000 mg compounded pentobarbital) as applied to him.
  • Ledford’s as‑applied claim rests on his long‑term gabapentin use (about a decade), which he alleges could blunt pentobarbital’s effect and cause a substantial risk of severe pain.
  • The district court denied a temporary restraining order and dismissed the complaint; Ledford appealed and moved for an emergency stay of execution.
  • The Eleventh Circuit reviewed the stay motion under the standard applicable to temporary restraining orders/stays pending appeal (four‑factor test).
  • The court denied the stay on three independent grounds: (1) the § 1983 challenge is time‑barred under Georgia’s two‑year statute of limitations (claims accrued in Oct. 2001 when Georgia adopted lethal injection); (2) alternatively, Ledford failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits (no showing of a sure or very likely risk of severe pain nor of available feasible alternatives); and (3) equitable considerations weigh against a stay because of Ledford’s last‑minute filing and the State’s and victims’ interest in finality.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness / Statute of limitations Ledford: his method‑of‑execution claim is timely given changes in 2013 (compounded pentobarbital & secrecy law) and his recent evidence about gabapentin interaction Georgia: claims accrued when lethal injection was adopted (Oct 2001); 2013 changes were not "substantial" under Eleventh Circuit precedent; Georgia has a 2‑year limitations period Court: claim is time‑barred (accrued Oct 2001); 2017 filing is untimely
Eighth Amendment — substantial risk of severe pain Ledford: decades of gabapentin use may blunt pentobarbital, making 5,000 mg insufficiently fast to render him insensate, creating a substantial risk of severe pain Georgia: expert testimony says 5,000 mg is more than sufficient even with gabapentin; Ledford’s experts do not quantify how gabapentin would prevent insensibility Court: Ledford failed to show it is "sure or very likely" he would suffer severe pain; no substantial likelihood of success
Adequacy of alternatives (feasible, readily implemented) Ledford: various claims including firing squad as alternative (argued would reduce risk) Georgia: no feasible, readily implemented alternative identified; state not obligated to adopt archaic methods; logistical and statutory barriers Court: Ledford failed to identify an alternative that is feasible/readily implemented and would significantly reduce risk; firing squad claim also untimely and implausible
Equitable relief / last‑minute filing Ledford: emergency circumstances justify stay and consideration despite lateness Georgia: late filing (5 days before execution) indicates delay and is prejudicial; State and victims have strong finality interests Court: equitable factors weigh against a stay—Ledford delayed, and State/victims’ interests favor denial

Key Cases Cited

  • Baze v. Rees, 553 U.S. 35 (2008) (Eighth Amendment challenge requires showing of risk that is sure or very likely to cause severe pain)
  • Glossip v. Gross, 135 S. Ct. 2726 (2015) (plaintiff must show both substantial risk and known, feasible alternatives)
  • Gissendaner v. Comm’r, Ga. Dep’t of Corr., 779 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 2015) (statute‑of‑limitations and timeliness principles for method‑of‑execution claims)
  • Wellons v. Comm’r, Ga. Dep’t of Corr., 754 F.3d 1260 (11th Cir. 2014) (related precedent on execution protocol challenges)
  • Jones v. Allen, 485 F.3d 635 (11th Cir. 2007) (dilatory, last‑minute challenges to execution protocols weigh against stays)
  • Nelson v. Campbell, 541 U.S. 637 (2004) (equitable factors, including delay and relative harms, govern stay requests)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ledford v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: May 15, 2017
Citation: 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8554
Docket Number: 17-12167 Non-Argument Calendar
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.