History
  • No items yet
midpage
League of Women Voters v. Brian Newby
2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17463
| D.C. Cir. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) requires states to accept a federally prescribed mail voter registration form (the "Federal Form") and limits that form to information "necessary" to assess eligibility. 52 U.S.C. § 20508(b)(1).
  • Several states (Alabama, Georgia, Kansas) enacted laws requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register; those states requested that the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) add their proof-of-citizenship requirements to the Federal Form.
  • On Jan. 29, 2016, the EAC Executive Director Brian Newby approved state-specific instructions for those three states reflecting the proof-of-citizenship requirements (the "Newby Decisions").
  • Voting-rights organizations (including Leagues of Women Voters) and two individuals sued under the Administrative Procedure Act seeking to enjoin the Newby Decisions; the district court denied a preliminary injunction for lack of irreparable harm.
  • On expedited appeal, the D.C. Circuit reversed, granting a preliminary injunction preventing the Commission (and agents) from giving effect to the Newby Decisions and ordering restoration of the prior Federal Form status quo pending final disposition.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Irreparable harm / standing of organizations Leagues: Newby Decisions will "perceptibly impair" registration programs, likely causing irreversible disenfranchisement before election deadlines Intervenors: harms are speculative, local affiliates (not national org) do drives; injuries are monetary/administrative, not irreparable Court: Organizations showed imminent, programmatic injury that is difficult to remediate before registration deadlines → irreparable harm established
Merits — APA review (arbitrary & capricious) Newby: failed to assess whether additions were "necessary" under §20508(b)(1); explicitly said necessity was irrelevant → abused discretion Intervenors: EAC/Executive Director permissibly deferred to states; statute ambiguous Court: Newby failed to make the statutorily required "necessary" finding; decision likely arbitrary and capricious
Statutory interpreter — who decides "necessary": Commission or states? Plaintiffs: NVRA assigns development of Federal Form to Commission; §20508(b)(1) limits content — Commission must determine necessity Intervenors/Kansas: states should determine what is necessary for their qualifications; EAC should defer Court: NVRA and Supreme Court precedent (ITCA) assign the Commission, not the states, the role of determining necessity; states may request changes but must show necessity under APA review
Balance of equities & public interest Plaintiffs: strong public interest in maximizing eligible voters and preventing disenfranchisement; unlawful agency action should not persist Intervenors: states have compelling interest in election integrity and preventing non-citizen registration; injunction causes administrative burden/confusion Court: equities and public interest favor injunction — risk of disenfranchising eligible voters and enforcing potentially unlawful agency action outweighs speculative fraud and administrative burdens

Key Cases Cited

  • Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc., 133 S. Ct. 2247 (2013) (NVRA limits states from adding requirements to Federal Form; Commission must review state requests and necessity)
  • Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008) (standard for preliminary injunction requires likelihood of success, irreparable harm, balance of equities, public interest)
  • Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29 (1983) (agency must examine relevant data and articulat e rational connection between facts and decision; arbitrary and capricious standard)
  • Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. England, 454 F.3d 290 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (standing and irreparable harm principles for organizational plaintiffs)
  • Kobach v. U.S. Election Assistance Comm'n, 772 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2014) (review of prior denials of state requests to modify Federal Form under NVRA)
  • League of Women Voters of N.C. v. North Carolina, 769 F.3d 224 (4th Cir. 2014) (irreparable harm where registration deadlines make relief impossible after the fact)
  • Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1 (2006) (public interest in minimizing judicially-caused election confusion and protecting right to vote)
  • SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194 (1947) (courts may not supply post hoc rationalizations for agency action)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: League of Women Voters v. Brian Newby
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Sep 26, 2016
Citation: 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 17463
Docket Number: 16-5196
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.