History
  • No items yet
midpage
424 S.W.3d 713
Tex. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Lawyers Title Company appeals a partial grant of summary judgment favoring Cooper and denial of Lawyers Title’s cross-motion; court reverses on three claims and remands.
  • Cooper wired $1.8 million to an escrow account controlled by Lawyers Title for Houston Street Property deal; no purchase occurred.
  • Funds were diverted to a separate Dallas property (McKinney Property) via Hawk’s office actions, leading to federal wire fraud indictments related to the McKinney transaction.
  • Escrow control and responsibility are disputed: Hawk’s fee-attorney office ostensibly held and disbursed funds; Lawyers Title personnel signed some documents but did not control disbursements.
  • Trial court found in Cooper’s favor on bailment, conversion, and money had and received; judgment severed those claims from the remainder of the suit.
  • Appellate court held genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment on the three claims and remanded for further proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Conversion elements present? Cooper owns funds; Lawyers Title controlled funds without authorization. Disbursements were authorized by Hawk’s office; Lawyers Title did not improperly control funds. Genuine fact issue; summary judgment improper
Bailment relationship established? Delivery to Lawyers Title as bailee; funds held in trust for Cooper. Escrow arrangement did not create a bailment with Lawyers Title as bailee. Genuine fact issue; summary judgment improper
Money had and received viable? Lawyers Title held Cooper’s money to Cooper’s benefit; funds belong to Cooper. Lawyers Title did not hold funds belonging to Cooper; mischaracterization of control. Genuine fact issue; summary judgment improper

Key Cases Cited

  • Wells Fargo Bank Nw., N.A. v. RPK Capital XVI L.L.C., 360 S.W.3d 691 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012) (conversion elements and owner control analysis)
  • Grand Champion Film Prod., L.L.C. v. Cinemark USA, Inc., 257 S.W.3d 478 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008) (damages and injury requirements in conversion)
  • United Mobile Networks, L.P. v. Deaton, 939 S.W.2d 146 (Tex. 1994) (elements of conversion and standing)
  • In re JXNB Internal Case, 483 F.3d 292 (5th Cir. 2007) (federal accounting and trust principles in escrow context)
  • Edland v. Bounds, 842 S.W.2d 719 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1992) (escrow and custodial responsibilities)
  • AN Collision Org. of Addison, Inc. v. Town of Addison, 310 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010) (summary-judgment standard and factual disputes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lawyers Title Company v. J.G. Cooper Development, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 10, 2014
Citations: 424 S.W.3d 713; 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 1448; 2014 WL 535719; 05-11-01537-CV
Docket Number: 05-11-01537-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Log In
    Lawyers Title Company v. J.G. Cooper Development, Inc., 424 S.W.3d 713