History
  • No items yet
midpage
754 S.E.2d 729
W. Va.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Busch, a West Virginia lawyer, served as Randolph County Prosecuting Attorney from 2009 to 2011; misconduct spans 2009–2011 and includes court-ordered disclosures and records handling; the Blake and Faulkner criminal cases involve improper handling of evidence and misrepresentations to the court; the Subcommittee found multiple Rule violations and recommended a three-year suspension and related conditions; Busch resigned as prosecutor in 2011 and has not practiced law since then; the Court adopts the Subcommittee’s sanctions after review.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Busch violated Rule 3.3 (false statements to tribunal) ODC: violations established; Busch admits violation but argues negligent intent Busch: conduct was negligent, not intentional Yes, Busch violated Rule 3.3 (intentional findings adopted)
Whether Busch violated Rule 3.4 (obstruction/disclosure) ODC: repeated failures to disclose and comply with court orders Busch: conduct not deliberate obstruction Yes, violations of Rule 3.4 established in both cases
Whether Busch violated Rule 3.8 (prosecutor duties) ODC: failure to disclose exculpatory evidence and misstatements undermine duties Busch: duties misunderstood or misapplied Yes, Rule 3.8 violations found in Blake and Faulkner cases
Whether Busch violated Rule 8.4(c)/(d) (dishonesty, interference with administration of justice) ODC: false representations to court and counsel; misrepresentations in filings Busch: disputed seriousness of misrepresentations Yes, violations of Rule 8.4(c) and (d) established
Whether three-year license suspension is appropriate given mitigating/aggravating factors Subcommittee recommended three-year suspension with additional requirements Busch contends punishment should be lesser due to negligenc e Yes, three-year suspension adopted with specified conditions

Key Cases Cited

  • Committee on Legal Ethics v. Walker, 178 W. Va. 150, 358 S.E.2d 234 (1987) (1987) (deterrence and public confidence in ethics standards described)
  • Office of Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel v. Jordan, 204 W. Va. 495, 513 S.E.2d 722 (1998) (1998) (sanctions framework and mitigating/aggravating factors)
  • Lawyer Disciplinary Bd. v. Scott, 213 W. Va. 209, 579 S.E.2d 550 (2003) (2003) (list of mitigating and aggravating factors; standards for sanctioning)
  • Committee on Legal Ethics v. Roark, 181 W. Va. 260, 382 S.E.2d 313 (1989) (1989) (public office misconduct considerations; heightened sanctions for public officials)
  • Committee on Legal Ethics v. Keenan, 192 W. Va. 90, 450 S.E.2d 787 (1994) (1994) (public protection role of disciplinary proceedings)
  • McCorkle v. Committee on Legal Ethics, 192 W. Va. 286, 452 S.E.2d 377 (1994) (1994) (standard of de novo review for questions of law and sanctions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Richard T. Busch
Court Name: West Virginia Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 5, 2014
Citations: 754 S.E.2d 729; 2014 WL 537754; 233 W. Va. 43; 2014 W. Va. LEXIS 107; 12-0174
Docket Number: 12-0174
Court Abbreviation: W. Va.
Log In
    Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Richard T. Busch, 754 S.E.2d 729