90 F.4th 593
1st Cir.2024Background
- Lawrence General Hospital (LGH) operates as a nonprofit hospital and held an “all risk” commercial property insurance policy from Continental Casualty Company that included standard property and business interruption coverage, as well as a specialized Health Care Endorsement for disease contamination.
- Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, LGH alleged it suffered physical damage due to SARS-CoV-2's presence on its property and filed claims for covered losses, including business interruption and contamination-related expenses.
- LGH also asserted it was subject to state and federal government orders mandating decontamination and compliance with enhanced cleaning protocols to continue certain medical procedures.
- The insurer, Continental, denied coverage, arguing that the policy’s physical loss or damage provisions and the Health Care Endorsement did not cover LGH’s COVID-19-related losses.
- LGH sued in Massachusetts state court; after removal to federal court, the district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. LGH appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does COVID-19 cause 'direct physical loss of or damage to property'? | Virus physically altered property via adsorption, requiring remediation. | Virus presence does not constitute physical loss or damage under MA law. | No coverage; court found no tangible property damage required active repair/remediation as per precedent. |
| Applicability of Disease Contamination Coverage | Government cleaning directives were compulsory decontamination orders. | Orders were not compulsory nor specifically for decontamination. | Orders were mandatory; provision potentially applies. Remanded for further proceedings on this claim. |
| Meaning of 'order' and 'decontamination' in policy context | Orders were not optional and cleaning amounted to decontamination. | LGH could have chosen not to perform elective procedures; decontamination unattainable for COVID-19. | Orders were compulsory; policy does not require lasting decontamination. |
| Whether exclusions bar contamination coverage | Coverage should apply given detailed compliance with orders. | Policy exclusions may apply to bar coverage. | District court to consider exclusions; issue not addressed on appeal. |
Key Cases Cited
- Verveine Corp. v. Strathmore Insurance Co., 184 N.E.3d 1266 (Mass. 2022) (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that loss or damage required tangible alteration and active remediation; mere presence of COVID-19 did not suffice)
- SAS International, Ltd. v. General Star Indemnity Co., 36 F.4th 23 (1st Cir. 2022) (reaffirmed that COVID-19’s presence is not physical damage under MA law)
- Legal Sea Foods, LLC v. Strathmore Insurance Co., 36 F.4th 29 (1st Cir. 2022) (similar holding regarding COVID-19-related insurance claims under MA law)
