History
  • No items yet
midpage
2014 IL App (2d) 130947
Ill. App. Ct.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Lashever, a school psychologist, sued Zion-Benton Township High School under the Whistleblower Act for damages from retaliation after reporting a counselor’s failure to report alleged student abuse.
  • She resigned on August 31, 2012, and filed suit on April 1, 2013, about seven months later, during which the district replaced her duties with a contractor.
  • The trial court dismissed the action under laches (735 ILCS 5/2-619(a)(9)), finding unreasonable delay prejudicial to the employer.
  • Illinois appellate law recognizes a six-month per se laches rule for discharged public-sector employees seeking back pay or reinstatement, with prejudice to the employer.
  • The court ultimately held laches barred Lashever’s back-pay claim; she did not seek reinstatement, front-pay was not viable, and the dismissal was affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether laches bars back pay even without reinstatement Lashever argues laches does not apply since no equitable relief is sought Laches applies to back-pay claims by discharged public employees Yes; laches bars back-pay claim.
Whether front pay could survive if back-pay barred Front pay asserted; not raised below Front pay not viable or argued Front-pay issue forfeited; no authority established.

Key Cases Cited

  • Summers v. Village of Durand, 267 Ill. App. 3d 767 (1994) (six-month laches rule for discharged public-sector employees)
  • Bill v. Board of Education of Cicero School District 99, 351 Ill. App. 3d 47 (2004) (laches applies to back-pay claims even when reinstatement is not pursued)
  • Long v. Tazewell/Pekin Consolidated Communications Center, 236 Ill. App. 3d 967 (1992) (supports six-month laches framework)
  • Coleman v. O’Grady, 207 Ill. App. 3d 43 (1990) (prejudice from delay justifies laches in public-employment suits)
  • Wabash County v. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund, 408 Ill. App. 3d 924 (2011) (prejudice requirement in laches analysis)
  • Schultheis v. City of Chicago, 240 Ill. 167 (1909) (early authority recognizing laches in quasi-equitable actions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lashever v. Zion-Benton Township High School
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Aug 25, 2014
Citations: 2014 IL App (2d) 130947; 14 N.E.3d 33; 383 Ill. Dec. 201; 2-13-0947
Docket Number: 2-13-0947
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In
    Lashever v. Zion-Benton Township High School, 2014 IL App (2d) 130947