Larry Bardney v. State of Mississippi
236 So. 3d 825
| Miss. Ct. App. | 2017Background
- In September 1994, two people (Tommie Penn and Patricia Young) were attacked; both later died; witnesses placed Larry Bardney at the scene and observed him chasing the victims. Blood consistent with Penn was found on Bardney's underwear and a shirt recovered at the scene was tied to him.
- Bardney was indicted for the murders of Penn and Young and pleaded guilty to both counts on June 19, 1995; the circuit court informed him of constitutional rights and potential sentences; he received two concurrent life terms.
- Bardney filed a post-conviction relief (PCR) motion in 1996, which the circuit court denied; the Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed in 1997.
- On July 7, 2015, Bardney filed a second PCR motion asserting a fatally defective indictment and ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to move to dismiss due to a speedy-trial violation.
- The Humphreys County Circuit Court denied the 2015 PCR motion on the merits; on appeal the Court of Appeals held Bardney's claims were procedurally barred (successive/time-bar) and that his ineffective-assistance claims were waived by his guilty plea.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fatally defective indictment | Indictment omitted language that it was brought "in the name and by the authority of the State," omitted "without authority of law," and failed to allege victims were "human beings." | The indictment charged unlawful, felonious killing with malice aforethought and named the victims; the defects (if any) are non-jurisdictional and waived by a voluntary guilty plea. | Court: Procedurally barred and waived; indictment properly charged murder and any nonjurisdictional defects were waived by the guilty plea. |
| Ineffective assistance — failure to move to dismiss for speedy-trial violation | Counsel was ineffective for not moving to dismiss on speedy-trial grounds. | Bardney waived non-jurisdictional trial rights by pleading guilty and failed to plead facts showing counsel’s performance was deficient or that a speedy-trial claim had merit. | Court: Waived and procedurally barred; claim lacks specific factual support and does not relate to voluntariness of plea. |
| Successive/time-bar of PCR motion | Second PCR filed ~20 years after plea, asserting new claims. | UPCCRA requires PCR within three years of conviction for guilty pleas; successive writs barred absent narrow exceptions. | Court: PCR was time-barred and barred as a successive writ; Bardney did not meet statutory exceptions. |
| Waiver consequences of guilty plea | Bardney contends errors remain despite plea. | A voluntary guilty plea waives all non-jurisdictional defects and most ineffective-assistance claims except those affecting voluntariness. | Court: Plea was knowing and voluntary; therefore many claims are waived; the record shows Bardney understood rights and consequences. |
Key Cases Cited
- Bardney v. State, 703 So.2d 861 (affirmed without published opinion) (prior PCR appeal affirming denial)
- Parish v. State, 203 So.3d 718 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016) (standard of review for PCR denials)
- Rowland v. State, 42 So.3d 503 (Miss. 2010) (fundamental constitutional errors excepted from UPCCRA bars)
- Jones v. State, 215 So.3d 508 (guilty plea waives ineffective-assistance claims except those implicating voluntariness)
- Turner v. State, 796 So.2d 998 (term "unlawfully" synonymous with "without authority of law")
- Windham v. State, 602 So.2d 798 (terms "malice aforethought" and "deliberate design" synonymous)
- Coffield v. State, 749 So.2d 215 (naming victims in indictment carries implication they are human beings)
- Kennedy v. State, 118 So.3d 684 (guilty plea operates as waiver of non-jurisdictional indictment defects)
