History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lanier v. State
288 Ga. 109
| Ga. | 2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Lanier was convicted of malice murder, armed robbery, and aggravated assault for the beating death of David Rigdon.
  • Evidence linked Lanier to the crime: DNA on a shoe matched the victim; blood spatters on Lanier’s shoe; wallet recovered at a location they visited.
  • Victim died from blunt-force head injuries likely inflicted with a hammer.
  • Defendant cooperated minimally; Mikell identified the drive route and implicated Lanier.
  • Trial court denied new-trial motion; Lanier appealed to Georgia Supreme Court; issues raised include evidence sufficiency, mistrial, ineffective assistance, and conflict of interest.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the evidence legally sufficient to support guilt? Lanier State Yes; evidence rationally supports verdict beyond a reasonable doubt.
Did the parole reference during cross-examination require mistrial? Lanier State No; reference was nonprejudicial and not a character conditioning comment.
Was counsel ineffective for not pursuing independent DNA testing or lab review? Lanier State No; no showing of deficient performance or probability of different outcome.
Was impeachment with a 1995 conviction properly denied for notice reasons? Lanier State No reversible error; impeachment impact minimal given witness credibility issues.
Did trial counsel’s alleged conflict of interest affect the outcome? Lanier State No; even if conflict existed, no demonstration it significantly affected performance.

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (sufficiency standard for federal review)
  • Isaac v. State, 269 Ga. 875 (1998) (nonresponsive or minor parole references do not place character at issue)
  • Walker v. State, 282 Ga. 703 (2007) (nonresponsive adverse effects on character are insufficient for mistrial)
  • Junior v. State, 282 Ga. 689 (2007) (mistrial denial reviewed for abuse of discretion)
  • Williams v. State, 284 Ga. 849 (2009) (tests for ineffective assistance based on expert testimony standards)
  • Allen v. State, 286 Ga. 392 (2010) (impeachment value of prior convictions and notice requirements)
  • White v. State, 287 Ga. 713 (2010) (conflict of interest considerations in Sixth Amendment context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Lanier v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 1, 2010
Citation: 288 Ga. 109
Docket Number: S10A1040
Court Abbreviation: Ga.