History
  • No items yet
midpage
Landrum v. State
163 So. 3d 1261
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Landrum was convicted in 2005 of second-degree murder with a weapon (life felony) and tampering with physical evidence, and sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder and five years for tampering.
  • She was a juvenile at the time of the offenses, raising Miller v. Alabama concerns about mandatory life without parole for juveniles.
  • Her first Rule 3.800(a) motion argued Miller prohibited her life-without-parole sentence; the postconviction court denied it as non-retroactive.
  • This court reversed based on Toye v. State, holding Miller retroactive, and remanded for further proceedings.
  • On remand, the State moved to strike a resentencing hearing; the postconviction court granted the motion, relying on Starks and Mason.
  • After Horsley and Chapter 2014-220, the legislature altered juvenile sentencing procedures and review, prompting questions about applicability to pre-enactment life sentences.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is Landrum’s life-without-parole sentence unconstitutional under Miller as retroactively applied? Landrum argues Miller applies retroactively, requiring individualized sentencing. State contends Miller does not compel retroactive application and that current statutes do not force resentencing. No, the court affirms the denial; Landrum’s sentence is not unconstitutional under the cited authorities.
Should Chapter 2014-220 and Horsley apply to Landrum’s pre-2014 life sentence? Landrum seeks application of the new procedures to her case to obtain individualized review. State argues the new procedures do not govern pre-enactment life sentences here. The court discusses the anomaly and certifies a question to the Florida Supreme Court; this opinion adopts the existing approach and does not retroactively apply the new procedures to Landrum.

Key Cases Cited

  • Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012) (mandatory LWOP for juveniles violates Eighth Amendment; individualized sentencing required)
  • Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (U.S. 2005) (death penalty unconstitutional for juveniles)
  • Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (U.S. 2010) (LWOP for nonhomicide juveniles unconstitutional)
  • Toye v. State, 133 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (Miller retroactive in Florida)
  • Starks v. State, 128 So. 3d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (life sentence for juvenile second-degree murder not unconstitutional when nonmandatory)
  • Mason v. State, 134 So. 3d 499 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (reliance on Starks; procedural posture in postconviction matters)
  • Daugherty v. State, 96 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (individualized sentencing considerations for juveniles)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Landrum v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 20, 2015
Citation: 163 So. 3d 1261
Docket Number: 2D14-2842
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.