Landon Gregory Greer v. Alba Rosy Greer
2017 WY 35
| Wyo. | 2017Background
- Parents divorced in 2014 in Cody, Wyoming; Mother awarded primary physical custody and Father liberal visitation (including six consecutive weeks during Father’s slow season).
- Mother struggled to find work in Cody, moved with the children to Arizona after notifying Father, and filed to modify visitation; Father cross-filed to modify custody and sought contempt.
- Mother initially faced a background-check barrier for a government job but obtained a substitute-teaching position and later a permanent offer; she testified the move was to obtain employment and avoid insolvency.
- The parties live over 1,000 miles apart; Father remarried and has a larger blended household; travel for visitation involves airline+car and scheduling conflicts with school calendar.
- District court found a material change of circumstances, applied statutory best-interest factors and Arnott relocation considerations, retained Mother as primary custodial parent, adjusted visitation, ordered Mother to share travel costs, and declined to hold her in contempt.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether district court abused discretion by keeping custody with Mother after relocation | Father: move unjustifiably reduced his visitation; custody worked in Cody; Mother moved hoping to find work and shouldn’t remain custodial | Mother: moved to obtain viable employment to support children; was primary caregiver; move was in children’s best interests | Court: No abuse of discretion; upheld Mother as primary custodian after weighing §20-2-201 factors and Arnott relocation factors |
| Whether district court abused discretion by refusing to hold Mother in contempt for interfering with visitation | Father: Mother’s move prevented him from exercising decree-ordered visitation; seeks contempt | Mother: complied with notice requirements; decree did not prohibit out-of-state move; move was for legitimate employment needs | Court: Affirmed refusal to hold contempt; record insufficient to show which contempt claimed, no decree violation shown, and procedural/record defects prevented review |
Key Cases Cited
- Arnott v. Arnott, 293 P.3d 440 (Wyo. 2012) (relocation may be a material change; courts must balance factors without presumptions)
- Tracy v. Tracy, 388 P.3d 1257 (Wyo. 2017) (abuse-of-discretion standard for custody modifications)
- Roemmich v. Roemmich, 238 P.3d 89 (Wyo. 2010) (standard for reviewing custody, visitation, and support modifications)
- Tropea v. Tropea, 665 N.E.2d 145 (N.Y. 1996) (relocation cases are particularly fraught and require careful balancing)
- Weidt v. State, 312 P.3d 1035 (Wyo. 2013) (indirect criminal contempt requires separate criminal proceeding)
- Stephens v. Lavitt, 239 P.3d 634 (Wyo. 2010) (distinguishing civil and criminal contempt standards)
- Watt v. Watt, 971 P.2d 608 (Wyo. 1999) (prior rule that change of residence alone is not necessarily a material change; later addressed by Arnott)
