History
  • No items yet
midpage
Landmark American Insurance v. Studio Imports, Ltd.
76 So. 3d 963
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Landmark insured Studio for commercial property, personal property, and business income under a contract.
  • October 2005 hurricane Wilma caused property damage and business income loss to Studio.
  • Studio claimed Landmark took an exceedingly long time to reimburse, causing additional damages including goodwill and banking relationships loss.
  • Studio filed a six-count complaint alleging breach of contract and statutory bad faith under section 624.155, Fla. Stat.
  • Trial court dismissed four counts, leaving only breach of contract and bad faith to be tried together; Landmark appeals.
  • Appellate court holds bad faith claim must be abated or dismissed before underlying merits are resolved.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Should the bad faith claim be abated or dismissed first? Studio argues both claims can proceed concurrently. Landmark argues bad faith should not proceed until liability/coverage are resolved. Bad faith claim should be abated or dismissed without prejudice until underlying breach is resolved.

Key Cases Cited

  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Tranchese, 49 So.3d 809 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (certiorari proper to abate bad-faith action until coverage/damages determined)
  • Blanchard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 575 So.2d 1289 (Fla.1991) (insurer benefits action must be resolved before bad-faith accrues)
  • Vanguard Fire & Casualty Co. v. Golmon, 955 So.2d 591 (Fla.1st DCA 2006) (court may abate statutory claims to conserve judicial economy)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Landmark American Insurance v. Studio Imports, Ltd.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Nov 16, 2011
Citation: 76 So. 3d 963
Docket Number: Nos. 4D10-5001, 4D10-5073
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.