History
  • No items yet
midpage
1:19-cv-07565
N.D. Ill.
Jul 2, 2020
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Lisa La Giglio worked as an account representative/manager at AssuredPartners from May 2016 to Sept. 2018 under supervisor Michael Melnick.
  • After a May 23, 2018 relocation to an isolated area, Melnick engaged in repeated unwelcome physical contact (rubbing/trailing fingers on her arm, shoulder massages), alleged up to nine times per day.
  • La Giglio complained internally on June 22–25, 2018 to President Anthony Pulgine and HR (Karen Kozik, Greg Crawford); Melnick admitted and apologized.
  • Management characterized the complaint as a "communication issue," required weekly meetings with Melnick, left her workstation near Melnick, and reassigned her accounts in Sept. 2018.
  • La Giglio resigned in Oct. 2018 (effective Oct. 12), attempted to rescind; Pulgine refused, gave 30 days, and she was terminated Nov. 12, 2018. She also alleges a prospective employer withdrew an offer after a reference call to AssuredPartners on Sept. 28, 2018.
  • Procedural posture: employer moved to dismiss La Giglio’s Title VII hostile work environment and retaliation claims; court denied the motion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Hostile work environment — harassment based on sex Melnick’s repeated, unwanted touching was sexual harassment and was motivated by her sex Complaint lacks facts linking conduct to her gender Court: reasonable to infer conduct was sex-based given sexual nature of touching; pleadings sufficient at this stage
Hostile work environment — severity/pervasiveness Repeated unwanted physical contact (frequent touching, close proximity) created abusive environment Conduct not severe or pervasive enough to alter employment conditions Court: allegations (frequency and physical contact) plausibly severe/pervasive to survive dismissal
Employer liability for coworker harassment Employer failed to take adequate remedial steps (left her near harasser; required meetings with him; reassigned her accounts; ultimately fired her) Employer took corrective action after notice Court: pleadings permit inference employer’s response was inadequate and forced plaintiff to bear the cost of the remedy; sufficient basis for liability at pleading stage
Retaliation — protected activity & adverse action Internal complaint was protected activity; adverse actions include heightened scrutiny, loss of accounts, interference with job prospects, termination Complaint did not clearly allege protected activity or adverse action (e.g., resignation/rescission issue; thin allegation about reference call) Court: internal complaint pleaded with facts; termination and alleged lost job offer are adverse actions and plausibly causally connected to complaint; retaliation claim survives dismissal

Key Cases Cited

  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) (plausibility pleading standard for motions to dismiss)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) (limits on accepting legal conclusions as true; context-specific plausibility inquiry)
  • Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998) (hostile work environment standard)
  • Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998) (sex-based harassment may be inferred in male–female contexts)
  • Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17 (1993) (totality of circumstances for hostile work environment: frequency, severity, threatening/humiliating nature, interference with work)
  • Parkins v. Civil Constructors of Ill., Inc., 163 F.3d 1027 (7th Cir. 1998) (application of hostile work environment framework)
  • Boumehdi v. Plastag Holdings, LLC, 489 F.3d 781 (7th Cir. 2007) (elements of a hostile work environment claim)
  • Smith v. Sheahan, 189 F.3d 529 (7th Cir. 1999) (employer liability for inadequate remedial measures)
  • Shafer v. Kal Kan Foods, Inc., 417 F.3d 663 (7th Cir. 2005) (employer forcing victim to bear cost of remedy can constitute discrimination)
  • Swanson v. Citibank, N.A., 614 F.3d 400 (7th Cir. 2010) (pleading requires a coherent story that could have happened)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: La Giglio v. AssuredPartners of Illinois, LLC
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Illinois
Date Published: Jul 2, 2020
Citation: 1:19-cv-07565
Docket Number: 1:19-cv-07565
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ill.
Log In
    La Giglio v. AssuredPartners of Illinois, LLC, 1:19-cv-07565