History
  • No items yet
midpage
486 F. App'x 967
3rd Cir.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • IDEA requires education with nondisabled children to the maximum extent appropriate.
  • L. has pervasive developmental disorder/autism; Fair Lawn proposed Stepping Stones, an autism-only program with no nondisabled interaction.
  • L.’s parents requested inclusion with typically developing peers; Fair Lawn denied on Nov 15, 2007.
  • Dec 20, 2007 IEP again proposed Stepping Stones; included no explicit nondisabled interaction, but allowed monitoring for future inclusion.
  • Feb 2008: Stepping Stones added a reverse-inclusion component; Mar 3, 2008 L. transferred to the inclusive Children’s Center.
  • ALJ found Fair Lawn compliant with IDEA (Oct 5, 2009); District Court granted summary judgment for Fair Lawn (June 27, 2011); appellate review followed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Predetermination of placement before meeting L.'s parents were excluded from premeeting drafting. Preparatory work without parents is not a procedural violation. Not a procedural violation; input opportunity existed.
Least restrictive environment compliance LRE requirement violated; more integrated placement possible with benefit. ALJ reasonably found LRE satisfied given L.'s needs and progress. Fair Lawn satisfied LRE; segregated setting provided meaningful benefit.
Exclusion of evidence from Children’s Center under bifurcation District Court erred in excluding Children’s Center evidence and progress data. Bifurcation rulings and time-management supported exclusion of cumulative evidence. No abuse of discretion; exclusion was permissible.

Key Cases Cited

  • Board of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982) (procedural emphasis on parental participation in IDEA)
  • Oberti ex rel. Oberti v. Bd. of Educ. of Clementon Sch. Dist., 995 F.2d 1204 (3d Cir. 1993) (two-part Oberti test for least restrictive environment)
  • Ramsey Bd. of Educ. v. L.E., 435 F.3d 384 (3d Cir. 2006) (clarifies standards for LRE and evidentiary deference)
  • Kingwood Twp. Bd. of Educ. v. Ramsey, 205 F.3d 572 (3d Cir. 2000) (framework for evaluating LRE for preschoolers)
  • Florence County Sch. Dist. Four v. Carter, 510 U.S. 7 (1993) (reimbursement when public placement is wrong and private placement is proper)
  • L.E. v. Ramsey Bd. of Educ., 435 F.3d 384 (3d Cir. 2006) (see above (listed for emphasis of standard))
  • Susan N. v. Wilson Sch. Dist., 70 F.3d 751 (3d Cir. 1995) (district court must weigh credibility findings and allow updated evidence)
  • Fuhrmann ex rel. Fuhrmann v. East Hanover Bd. of Educ., 993 F.2d 1031 (3d Cir. 1993) (admissibility of evidence and procedural aspects in IDEA review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: L.G. Ex Rel. E.G. v. Fair Lawn Board of Education
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: Jun 28, 2012
Citations: 486 F. App'x 967; 11-3014
Docket Number: 11-3014
Court Abbreviation: 3rd Cir.
Log In