History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kyser v. Bank of America, N.A.
186 So. 3d 58
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Kyser challenged a foreclosure judgment in favor of Bank of America, N.A. on standing grounds.
  • Bank of America attached a note to the foreclosure complaint without endorsements initially.
  • Bank of America later filed what it claimed to be the original mortgage and note, with a witness noting a blank endorsement on the note.
  • Prior decisions require standing to appear at filing and at final judgment, with endorsements or proof of holder status before filing.
  • The court concluded the bank failed to prove standing due to lack of pre-filing endorsement or proper note ownership evidence, despite subsequent filings.
  • Final judgment for foreclosure was reversed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Standing to foreclose at filing Kyser argues BOA lacked standing at filing. Bank contends it possessed the note and mortgage and thus had standing. BOA lacked standing at filing; judgment reversed.
Effect of undated blank endorsement Undated blank endorsement proves standing if pre-filing. Undated endorsement is insufficient without pre-filing proof. Undated blank endorsement alone insufficient; pre-filing endorsement required.
Assignment of mortgage vs note Assignment of mortgage might prove standing. Assignment that only transfers mortgage, not the note, does not prove standing. Assignment reflecting only mortgage does not prove standing.
Credit to testimony on possession Plaintiff possessed the original note and mortgage. Possession alone without proper endorsement timing is insufficient. Possession plus proper endorsement before filing required; testimony insufficient.

Key Cases Cited

  • Kelly v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 170 So.3d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (undated blank endorsement insufficient to prove standing at filing)
  • Tilus v, AS Michai LLC, 161 So.3d 1284 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (assignment of mortgage alone does not prove standing)
  • Lamb v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 174 So.3d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (assignment of mortgage not sufficient to prove note ownership)
  • Bristol v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 137 So.3d 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (note filed after complaint with undated endorsement insufficient)
  • Lindsey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 139 So.3d 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (original note not properly endorsed or assigned to appellee)
  • Sosa v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 153 So.3d 950 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (standing not established when endorsements were filed after suit)
  • Peuguero v. Bank of Am., N.A., 169 So.3d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (endorsements before filing supported standing)
  • Seidler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 179 So.3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (dated blank endorsement evidence of earlier payee status)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kyser v. Bank of America, N.A.
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 23, 2016
Citation: 186 So. 3d 58
Docket Number: No. 1D15-1027
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.