History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kropf v. Kropf
24 A.3d 405
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Married Jan 11, 2005; separation in 2008 with Wife relocating to Lehigh County from Schuylkill County.
  • Wife filed a divorce complaint in Lehigh County in May 2008 (reinstituted July 2008; August 2010 reinstatement).
  • Husband was served Aug 21, 2010; Wife sought entry of a divorce decree Sept 21, 2010.
  • Husband filed Sept 22, 2010 petition to transfer venue to Schuylkill County based on alleged improper venue and forum non conveniens.
  • October 27, 2010 hearing; October 29, 2010 order denying transfer of venue; November 18, 2010 divorce decree entered.
  • Husband appeals asserting venue was improper because Wife had not resided in Lehigh County for six months before filing; forum non conveniens also raised.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether trial court erred denying transfer of venue. Kropf argues Lehigh venue improper; Wife resided in Lehigh. Kropf relies on venue rules and wants Schuylkill as proper forum. Denied; court affirmed decree, venue proper in Lehigh per Leib and related precedent.
Whether forum non conveniens was properly considered and preserved. Kropf argues forum non conveniens supports transfer. Kropf did not establish oppression/vexation; waiver not complete. Court did not abuse discretion; venue denial affirmed; forum non conveniens not proven.

Key Cases Cited

  • Leib v. Leib, 400 Pa.Super. 257 (1990) (residence need not be six months; residence in county suffices for venue)
  • Danz v. Danz, 947 A.2d 750 (Pa.Sup;2008) (extensive discussion on venue in divorce actions)
  • Wood v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., 829 A.2d 707 (Pa.Super.2003) (Rule 1006(d) venue transfer no time limit for forum non conveniens)
  • Cheeseman v. Lethal Exterminator, 549 Pa. 200 (1997) (burden to show plaintiff's forum is oppressive or vexatious)
  • Jones v. Jones, 878 A.2d 86 (Pa.Super.2005) (issues not properly developed/waived without authority)
  • Gogets v. Gogets, 267 Pa.Super. 458 (1979) (venue challenge in divorce actions; waiver rules)
  • Hoose v. Jefferson Home Health Care, Inc., 754 A.2d 1 (Pa.Super.2000) (evidence required to prove oppressive forum)
  • Catagnus v. Allstate Ins. Co., 864 A.2d 1259 (Pa.Super.2004) (forum non conveniens considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kropf v. Kropf
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jun 14, 2011
Citation: 24 A.3d 405
Docket Number: 3331 EDA 2010
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.