History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kroger v. Taylor
320 Ga. App. 298
Ga. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Kroger and Sedgwick appeal a trial court denial of their motion to intervene in Betty Taylor's workers’ compensation tort action.
  • They contend their subrogation claim is timely and they are inadequately represented by current parties.
  • Taylor filed her tort action within the applicable statute of limitations.
  • Kroger and Sedgwick had paid more than $26,000 in workers’ compensation benefits.
  • Trial court denied intervention as untimely under OCGA § 34-9-11.1 (c); judgment entered for New Bern on that issue.
  • Court reverses, finding intervention by Kroger and Sedgwick proper under OCGA § 34-9-11.1 (c) and OCGA § 9-11-24 (a).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timeliness and right to intervene under OCGA 34-9-11.1 (c) Taylor timely tort claim triggers right to intervene Intervention was untimely under statute Intervention granted as of right under 34-9-11.1 (c)
Representational adequacy and potential impairment under 9-11-24 (a) (2) Kroger/Sedgwick’s interest not protected by existing parties No adequate representation Trial court abused discretion; intervention allowed to protect interests
Relation to broader civil practice act provisions Subrogation rights supersede other joinder provisions Civil Practice Act controls; no direct supersession OCGA 34-9-11.1 (c) controls; right to intervene is unconditional; supersedes others

Key Cases Cited

  • Payne v. Dundee Mills, 235 Ga. App. 514 (Ga. App. 1998) (timeliness and intervention standard; reversal when denial harms intervenor)
  • Intl. Maintenance Corp. v. Inland Paper Bd. & Packaging, 256 Ga. App. 752 (Ga. App. 2002) (intervention rights when prerequisites met; discretion limited)
  • Newsome v. Dept, of Administrative Svcs., 241 Ga. App. 357 (Ga. App. 1999) (subrogation/time-bar distinctions influencing intervention)
  • AC Corp. v. Myree, 221 Ga. App. 513 (Ga. App. 1996) (intervention analysis under 9-11-24; respect for statute-specific provision)
  • Stephens v. McGarrity, 290 Ga. App. 755 (Ga. App. 2008) (timely intervention may prevent impairment of interest)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kroger v. Taylor
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Mar 12, 2013
Citation: 320 Ga. App. 298
Docket Number: A12A1765
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.