History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kristina B. v. Edward B.
329 P.3d 202
Alaska
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Ed and Kristina B. separated after sharing a son; custody was awarded to Ed after trial; court found a history of domestic violence by Ed but concluded it was unlikely to recur; Kristina had long-standing substance abuse issues (alcohol and narcotics) and Crohn’s disease affecting parenting; Kristina underwent Mayo Clinic treatment but did not complete recommended programs; the court ordered urinalysis testing for Kristina and Ed contemplated a move to Texas with visitation and child-support considerations.
  • Kristina’s sobriety appeared improving at trial, but the court questioned her credibility regarding sobriety; Ed completed a 36-week batterers’ intervention and related counseling, and the court found he did not pose a future risk; Kristina’s conduct included an accidental fire in a garage which the court treated as an act of domestic violence against the child; the superior court awarded Ed sole legal and primary physical custody and approved his Texas move.
  • The trial court applied AS 25.24.150(g) presuming Ed could not be awarded custody due to a history of domestic violence but found the presumption overcome; the court weighed Kristina’s sobriety and substance-abuse history in determining best interests; visitation and support orders were crafted with ongoing monitoring and protections; remand was ordered to reconsider Kristina’s urinalysis cost in child support and the visitation schedule after sobriety.
  • The appellate court remanded for two issues: whether Kristina’s court-ordered urinalysis costs should reduce child support, and whether Kristina’s visitation should become more liberal after a year of sobriety; on all other issues the lower court’s decision was affirmed.
  • Ed’s move to Texas was found to be legitimately motivated by family and economic reasons; Kristina argued it was to undermine her relationship with the child, but the court’s motivation finding was given deference and not clearly erroneous.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Presumption against custody due to domestic violence Kristina argues Ed failed to overcome AS 25.24.150(g) Ed showed completion of batterers’ program and lack of ongoing substance abuse Presumption overcome; Ed awarded custody
Weight given to domestic violence in best interests Ed’s DV history warranted greater weight Court credibly found DV unlikely to recur and weighed it appropriately Court did not abuse discretion in weighing DV under AS 25.24.150(c)
Whether AS 25.24.150(k) applies If Kristina is deemed unfit due to abuse effects, k applies Court focused on Kristina’s substance abuse and Crohn’s disease, not PTSD as basis to deny custody AS 25.24.150(k) not the controlling basis; other factors supported custody decision
Whether Kristina committed an act of domestic violence Kristina contends no DV act occurred Fire in garage shows reckless endangerment constituting DV Kristina committed an act of domestic violence against her son
Urinalysis costs, and visitation costs in child support Urinalysis costs should reduce child support; move costs should be shared Costs should follow Rule 90.3 with potential deviation only for good cause; travel costs limited by record Remand for urinalysis cost variance; visitation-cost split affirmed; consult on overall finances at remand

Key Cases Cited

  • Limeres v. Limeres, 320 P.3d 291 (Alaska 2014) (credibility deference to trial court in custody disputes; weighing of evidence)
  • Stephanie F. v. George C., 270 P.3d 737 (Alaska 2012) (overcoming DV presumption may rely on more than formal proof; credibility considerations)
  • Williams v. Barbee, 243 P.3d 995 (Alaska 2010) (best interests factors may be weighed non‑uniformly by trial court)
  • Ebertz v. Ebertz, 113 P.3d 643 (Alaska 2005) (standard for appellate review of factual findings in custody cases)
  • Moeller-Prokosch v. Prokosch, 27 P.3d 314 (Alaska 2002) (scope of evidence regarding best interests and credibility of witnesses)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kristina B. v. Edward B.
Court Name: Alaska Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 3, 2014
Citation: 329 P.3d 202
Docket Number: 6922 S-14865
Court Abbreviation: Alaska