History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kris Edward Rau v. State
02-15-00208-CR
| Tex. App. | Apr 6, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Rau was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison plus a $10,000 fine; the State prosecuted at trial with multiple evidentiary pieces and witness testimony, including a jailhouse informant; Lianne Murray died from a gunshot wound in Wise County, Texas, after a violent confrontation with Rau and Rau fled to Florida, disposing of a pistol and other items; the defense framed death as suicide, while the State contended Rau killed her and attempted to conceal the crime; investigators confronted inconsistencies in Rau’s timeline, physical scene handling, and disposal of evidence; the court admitted the jailhouse informant testimony and addressed objections to the prosecutor’s punishment-phase arguments.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence to prove murder Rau Rau claimed insufficiency to prove elements and his mental state Evidence suffices to support conviction
Admission of jailhouse informant testimony under Rule 403 Rau Cox’s testimony should be excluded as prejudicial Not reversible error; balancing on record not required; admission upheld
Balancing test for Rule 403 on record Rau contends balancing not performed Trial court did balance; need not state on record No reversible error; court's decision within discretion
Mistrial denial over polygraph reference Rau Polygraph mention without mistrial demand No abuse of discretion; lack of mistrial proper given nonresponsive reference

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. Supreme Ct. 1989) (standard for sufficiency of evidence in criminal cases)
  • Jenkins v. State, 493 S.W.3d 583 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (evidentiary sufficiency and weighing conflicts in testimony)
  • Moff v. State, 131 S.W.3d 485 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (circumstantial evidence probative as direct evidence; presumption in favor of verdict)
  • Montgomery v. State, 369 S.W.3d 188 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (standard to defer to factfinder on conflicts in testimony)
  • Temple v. State, 390 S.W.3d 341 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (circumstantial evidence and inference considerations in sufficiency review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Kris Edward Rau v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 6, 2017
Docket Number: 02-15-00208-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.