History
  • No items yet
midpage
30 A.3d 54
Del. Ch.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Wesco Financial Corporation merged with Montana Acquisitions, LLC (a Berkshire subsidiary) with Berkshire owning 80.1% of Wesco prior to the merger.
  • Minority Wesco stockholders could elect cash, Berkshire Class B stock, or a mix; non-electors received cash by default.
  • The election form deadline preceded the special meeting; the proxy and election forms were separate documents.
  • Proxy statement stated Wesco holders would not have appraisal rights; the merger was effected under 8 Del. C. § 264.
  • Number of shares electing cash, Berkshire stock, and non-electors were disclosed; no stockholder demanded appraisal.
  • The court held, on cross-motions for partial summary judgment, that Wesco stockholders were not entitled to appraisal rights.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether appraisal rights apply to the Wesco-Berkshire merger Krieger contends appraisal rights exist for forced cash. Wesco/Berkshire argue market-out and §262(b)(2) remove rights. No appraisal rights; market-out not triggered.
Whether §262(b)(2) restores appraisal rights due to the form of consideration Krieger argues exception to market-out applies because cash could be received. No, holders were not required to take non-stock consideration. §262(b)(2) did not restore rights.
Whether the stockholder-by-stockholder view controls appraisal rights Krieger emphasizes individual electors should trigger rights. Statute is class-wide; availability is transactional. Appraisal rights are class-wide, not stockholder-by-stockholder.
Whether alleged misleading disclosures about appraisal rights affected rights Krieger claims proxy misled about rights. Disclosure was immaterial since rights were not available. Disclosures were accurate and complete; no quasi-appraisal remedy.

Key Cases Cited

  • Gilbert v. El Paso Co., 575 A.2d 1131 (Del. 1990) (framework for appraisal rights analysis; contextual precedent)
  • La. Mun. Police Employees' Ret. Sys. v. Crawford, 918 A.2d 1172 (Del. Ch. 2007) (addresses threshold for appraisal rights in market-out context)
  • Berger v. Pubco Corp., 976 A.2d 132 (Del. 2009) (quasi-appraisal remedy for disclosure violations in certain mergers)
  • Gen. DataComm Indus., Inc. v. State of Wis. Inv. Bd., 731 A.2d 818 (Del.Ch. 1999) (settled approach to unsettled law on disclosure of appraisal rights)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Krieger v. WESCO FINANCIAL CORP.
Court Name: Court of Chancery of Delaware
Date Published: Oct 13, 2011
Citations: 30 A.3d 54; 2011 Del. Ch. LEXIS 161; 2011 WL 4916910; CA. 6176-VCL
Docket Number: CA. 6176-VCL
Court Abbreviation: Del. Ch.
Log In
    Krieger v. WESCO FINANCIAL CORP., 30 A.3d 54